• 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well yes that’s obvious

    It’s supposed to be publicly funded, not traded

    Someone a long time ago must have misheard

    • herrcaptain@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Except it’s actually the best of both worlds for the rich - as far as I know, a lot of these companies are publicly traded AND receive public funding.

      • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Publicity traded, AKA shareholders leverage the company to make return on their investment and this company also receives public money just for the hell of it? Wow, what a combination. Totally not a setup for major exploitation.