• fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    It might be beneficial for some to understand the “what” and “why” behind the “no,” no?

    • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sure, but why not just lead with a negative assertion instead of implying that there’s an open question? The question implies that there is controversy, even when none exists.

      Fact Checking RFK Jr’s False Claims About Fluoride

      Would be a perfectly acceptable headline.