• Madison420@lemmy.world
    0·
    9 days ago

    It’s bad Grammer and highly regionalized at that.

    So a douche and an anarchist, who could have guessed that combination.

    I did.

    We got the douche part already, lets take it back a notch before you cut yourself with all that edge.

    • TʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      0·
      9 days ago

      Okie dokie

      I’m mostly only a douche to fascists and conservatives and capitalists and liberals and people I disagree with on small things

      Not to me you didn’t. I went back up the chain and I see you kind of half asked someone else, but not me

      Me IRL: 1000006214

            • TʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              0·
              9 days ago

              Huh? I initially said “right.” Which means “correct”/“yes.” You never asked for an explanation. You asked a yes or no question, which I answered, and then complained that I didn’t offer an explanation?

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                0·
                9 days ago

                Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain.

                Anarchism exists yes, that didn’t imply you are an anarchist you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.

                If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.

                • TʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  0·
                  9 days ago

                  Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain.

                  You said “so no laws?” And I said “right.” That’s pretty clear cut to me. What do you want explained?

                  you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.

                  Fear not, I’m also part of plenty of other nonsense

                  If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.

                  Lol