• TʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    0·
    9 days ago

    Huh? I initially said “right.” Which means “correct”/“yes.” You never asked for an explanation. You asked a yes or no question, which I answered, and then complained that I didn’t offer an explanation?

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      0·
      9 days ago

      Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain.

      Anarchism exists yes, that didn’t imply you are an anarchist you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.

      If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.

      • TʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        0·
        9 days ago

        Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain.

        You said “so no laws?” And I said “right.” That’s pretty clear cut to me. What do you want explained?

        you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.

        Fear not, I’m also part of plenty of other nonsense

        If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.

        Lol