• syd@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I wish Graphene would choose a better phone than ugly-looking Pixels.

    • gigachad@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      My problem is not their design but the fact they are Google phones, as I boycott Google. Also second hand Pixels are hard to acquire for a reasonable price…

      • MagneticFusion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        you pay them with money rather than with your data. to me it seems like a reasonable exchange

      • evo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        as I boycott Google

        So you shouldn’t really be using any Android phone then…

        • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          What, and use Apple? Linux phones aren’t usable yet, and at least android is open source so using a non google Android phone doesn’t support Google.

      • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        They are not hard to acquire, and they only have an “unreasonable price” if they are recent models.

        You won’t have any trouble finding a second-hand Pixel 5.

        I recently bought a Pixel 4a at 120€ / 131$

      • 🔥N3][W0RK 4C][IVIS][🔥@troet.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        @gigachad @syd
        GrapheneOS wird exklusiv für Google Pixel-Geräte entwickelt - andere Geräte werden nicht unterstützt. Hintergrund dieser Einschränkung sind die hohen Sicherheitsanforderungen von GrapheneOS. Die folgenden Anforderungen werden derzeit nur von Google Pixel Geräten vollständig erfüllt:

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Guess that depends on what you mean by reasonable.

        The 5 is $130 as refurb, with warranty, from walmart. It was $699 new.

        If you want a newer phone, well, it’s gonna cost more. Just like brand new phones.

        If their price is still “high”, that simply reflects their desireabilty, probably from a balance of features and performance by price.

      • littletranspunk@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Pretty much. No idea why you were down voted. They’re so damn fragile that they need a case anyway.

        So, screen with random (protective) case design. Yup, they all look the same

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’d choose a Samsung if it supported graphene, but it is what it is

    • Chemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      As far as I know they only accept Pixel devices because they are the only devices on the market that allow locking the bootloader after installation and also because of the Titan coprocessor which greatly increases system security

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why would I want to lock the bootloader? I like having freedom 9f OS, I don’t want to replace one OS I’m locked into with a different, albeit more privacy friendly one. Most laptops have unlocked bootloaders.

      • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        There’s also a third reason, which is regular and timely firmware updates. One of the reasons why the GrapheneOS team rejected the Fairphone was due to the lack of proper firmware updates.

      • FrameXX@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        because they are the only devices on the market that allow locking the bootloader after installation

        AFAIK on Xiaomi Mi A2 lite if I flash back the stock fastboot ROM (I had it do it once because I crippled the partition images (this phone is A/B partition device)) it locks your bootloader and you have to unlock it again. I don’t know if this applyes to MIUI/Hyper OS phones too, because Mi A2 Lite uses near to stock Android.

      • syd@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I remember I was not able to re-lock bootloader after custom rom installation, so you’re probably right. Unfortunately there are not many phones left to install custom ROMs except Chinese ones :/