• nicetriangle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    These tech articles on some new advancement are basically the same phenomenon of bullshit as articles ending in a question mark. The answer is always “nah”

  • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Sensationalized clickbait.

    100 microwatts, aiming for 1W in 2025. That’s a big difference and 1W is still not enough for a cell phone. Phone-scale batteries aren’t even on the roadmap.

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    That could is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that headline.

    Also, we can barely get OEMs to support phones for 5 years now…

      • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        And they don’t support anything higher than 3G, which will go in history in a few years… and then the only thing you can use them for is a paper weight.

        • Noerttipertti@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Bollocks. Nokia 800 tough, 2660 flip, 2720 flip, 225 4g, 6300 4g, 8000 4g - just from one manufacturer, and there’s plenty of others.

          • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            They’re called burner phones. No real OS on them, no upgrade path, nothing. You wanna make phone calls and send SMS, that’s fine, but let’s face it, most people nowadays don’t use phones just for that.

    • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’d say, 10 years is more than enough, the device is practically unusable after that, even if it’s still working.

      • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        the device is practically unusable after that, even if it’s still working.

        Not if you can change the battery…

        I am having to retire my 7 year old S5, which still works perfectly, because 3G networks are being switched off in a couple of months.

        • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It won’t work with modern apps in about 3 or 4 years, or even if it does, it’ll be so slow, it would practically be unusable.

          I have an Asus Zenfone 3 Max from 2016. It has 8 cores @ 900MHz and 3GB of RAM. I only use it for BT auido streaming (play music on a modified audio system from the 90’s), that’s it. It can play YT videos at Full HD, but searching and screen flipping is so slow, it’s practically unusable. Everything is generally slow on it, even browsing. It takes like 10+ seconds to load a more complex page (with media). Sorry, but that’s unusable to me.

  • Juviz@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Some of the first pacemakers used radioactive batteries. We left that concept pretty fast. And that is considering you have to cut your patient open to change a pacemaker battery. This will not happen in commercial cellphones

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      And that’s for a battery that only produces 100 microwatts. A battery that produces 10000 times more power will be a lot spicier.

  • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    So the reinventing of the Nokia is here. Capitalism probably won’t allow it unfortunately, the enshittening depends on degradation of everything

    • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      True, true.

      Stil, it’s a nice idea… we can dream.

      I just pitty all those artists that envisioned the 21st century with flying cars and stuff like that… we still run almost everything on petrol.

  • a1studmuffin@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Remember when light bulbs used to last decades? A phone battery that lasts that long is incompatible with capitalism.

    • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The battery is not the main point of failure in contemporary phones, especially not one that makes you buy new unit. This new radioactive battery doesn’t change much

    • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Others pointed this out as well. It seems it is a scam, but it might become a viable solution in the not so distant future (10 years or so from now).