• Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Yes* unfortunately. It’s very popular.

      I’ll never understand why people enjoy P2W games.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        It’s not P2W though, right? I thought they only sell cosmetics w/o competitive advantage (outside a mistake here and there), everything that actually impacts competitiveness is provided equally to everyone.

        If that’s not the case, could you link something that indicates that?

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          I would say you are right, because all the playable legends are able to be bought with the free currency you can get by just playing the game.

          I guess some people could make the argument that paying players have faster access to new legends and legendary finishers, etc. I would say this is more like “pay to skip some grinding” than “pay to win”.

    • Mwa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      And they ask their users to use Microsoft spyware os,this is really bad for privacy.

  • Kroxx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Is this not the game I saw an article about like yesterday saying EA had missed revenue forecasts and EA stated a major overhaul is needed?

    I guess step one is to restrict the player base more.

  • lemmur@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Wasn’t Apex Legends the game, that run better in wine than natively on windows?

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    How much fucking harder/extra work is it to maintain a Linux version of something? God damn, I don’t even really use Linux outside of servers and I still think it’s bullshit how little support it gets because it’s like a Catch 22. Nobody works on it because nobody uses it; but nobody uses it because nobody works on it! (For gaming, anyway)

    It’s amazing how much actual change this one piece of hardware has done to bolster Linux’s share of things, but it’s still also just kind of a drop in the bucket.

    • Mwa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Ohh my god true, these companies are massive but man for a while many games are windows first.

  • Presi300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Would’ve cared… If the game had gotten any good updates for the past… Year? Probably more at this point.

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    One of the few ea games I played,what a shame ig my luck truly died down.
    Edit after reading the article it’s that same excuse, too muc hakers,dude isnt your game full of hackers wayy before linux users.(I wrote it like that to make fun of companies that say linux is a way for hackers)
    But this is the time to quit all greedy companies.

  • bitwolf@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Someone did the math on Twitter.

    There is about 2900 Linux gamers playing Apex.

    So even if 100% of Linux gamers cheated it could in no way be the majority.

    What I think happened is the dev team struggled to solve the problem so they used Linux as a scapegoat when leadership came down on them.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      This sounds likely. Unfortunately, when the problem doesn’t go away a few months from now, it’s not like they’ll reenable Linux support…

  • sp6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    If you accidentally ban linux users in three[1] different[2] banwaves[3], then linux was only halfway supported in the first place, even if they overturned (almost) all of those bans.

    I think the real reason they did it was EA’s financial situation. Since money is tight, the amount of resources they were willing to put into real linux anti-cheat probably dropped to “none at all,” and now we’re here. Otherwise other cheater-prone games like Counter Strike, Overwatch, Halo, The Finals, DayZ, Hunt Showdown, etc would have probably dropped/blocked linux by now too.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      I would be so upset if Hunt Showdown did this.

      Hell, I’m mad Apex Legends did it and I have very little time invested in that game.

      I really wish game developers would stop with this kernel level anticheat nonsense that doesn’t even work. Everyone in every gaming community just points the finger, people that play games using Easy Anticheat say Battleye sucks and vice versa.

      If kernel level anticheat actually worked, there would be a definitive answer to which games have good anticheat.

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    This is really going to validate the anti-Steamdeck/anti-Linux gamers. It shouldn’t.

    “You can’t play shitty MMO Battle Royale games if you’re on a Linux PC!”

    Fucking good. That’s a feature.

    • ℍ𝕖𝕝𝕚0𝕤@social.ggbox.fr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      It’s also keeping people from even considering linux for gaming so I don’t share your sentiment. Like it or not, these games are insanely popular. My gaming buddies won’t even think of switching to linux until 100% of the games they play are working on it, and that include “shitty MMO Battle Royale” I’m sorry to say.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Why is it a good thing that people can’t enjoy the games they like on Linux?

  • Pavidus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    This must be the drastic change to increase monetization they were talking about just yesterday.

          • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            Counterpoint - Devs need to eat. Especially devs that are thoughtful enough to enable their anti-cheat to work on Linux. So yeah, they had my attention, my support, and my money. In return I got to play a fun game and rock some cool skins and accessories - it certainly seemed like a win-win. Now they’ve retroactively backed out of their support, and I’d like to back out mine as well.

            • ad_on_is@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 days ago

              Me too… I bought one Apex pack solely because the introduced Linux support a month after I switched to Linux.

            • rtxn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              23 days ago

              Ah yes, “the devs”. What percentage of the profit do you think goes to the gameplay developers, the backend developers, the designers, the character artists, the environment artists, the QA team, the writers, the voice talent, the localization teams, and the other roles too numerous to list but too important to ignore, that actually create the game? In contrast, how much do the executives, managers, and parasites shareholders pocket?

              Even if you assume a fair division between all people, just look at how long the credits list is. The average developer employee won’t go hungry because a couple hundred players stop buying gamble coins.

            • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 days ago

              Agreed to a point. I don’t care so much that “the devs need to eat” because these are AAA corporations, not indie devs. The moderate gains and losses aren’t directly affecting the people that actually made the game, they’re just affecting the bonuses the CEOs get. What does matter though is that if we as Linux gamers want them to care, they need to see that Linux users are generating revenue. They’re greedy corpos and revenue is all they give a shit about. I’m OK contributing a small amount to games that continue to support Linux. I’m OK spending $5 every few months to buy the Overwatch 2 battle pass if it means Blizzard sees that someone who only plays on Linux is generating income. I’m certain they looked at the money coming in from Linux players more than the actual number of said players when making this decision. The only way to make corporate monsters care about you is to feed their greed. Sometimes, feeding them a small amount can potentially help your cause.

              • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                23 days ago

                What does matter though is that if we as Linux gamers want them to care, they need to see that Linux users are generating revenue. They’re greedy corpos and revenue is all they give a shit about.

                I appreciate you mentioning this, I agree. If linux made a blip on a chart, executives would prioritize figuring out a solution.

              • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                23 days ago

                I’m not sure what your point is? Perhaps I incorrectly assumed this was obvious but yes - if players do not financially support a game, even “free to play” games, those games disappear. There is not a single company on the planet that is going to continue investing in a negative revenue project for funsies. The teams working on the game are relocated to other projects or laid off, and the game shuts down.

                If you believe I’m in the wrong for supporting a game that, until this point, was friendly to linux - then so be it.

    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      you gotta contact EA about it, and something’s telling me they’re just going to quote some part of their ToC telling us to get fucked.

      • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        alright then flood them CC charge backs, let them explaining to their payment processor why everybody decided to do this all at the same time ;)