OK, its just a deer, but the future is clear. These things are going to start kill people left and right.

How many kids is Elon going to kill before we shut him down? Whats the number of children we’re going to allow Elon to murder every year?

  • Madnessx9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Full speed in the dark, I think most people would failed to avoid that. What’s concerning is it does not stop afterwards

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Note that part of the discussion is we shouldn’t settle for human limitations when we don’t have to. Notably things like LIDAR are considered to give these systems superhuman vision. However, Tesla said ‘eyes are good enough for folks, so just cameras’.

      The rest of the industry said LIDAR is important and focus on trying to make it more practical.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Hell, even not having lidar The thing was pretty clearly a large road obstacle a second and a half out. They had a whole left lane open At least enough time to do a significant speed reduction.

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The rest of the industry said LIDAR is important and focus on trying to make it more practical.

        Volvo is using LIDAR. I trust them way more than Tesla when it comes to something pertaining to safety.

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Isn’t Elon advertising AI as orders of magnitudes better reaction time and much less error prone than a human though…

      • lando55@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Remember when they removed ultrasonic and radar sensors in favor of “Tesla Vision”? That decision demonstrably cost people their lives and yet older, proven tech continues to be eschewed in favor of the cutting edge new shiny.

        I’m all for pushing the envelope when it comes to advancements in technology and AI in its many forms, but those of us that don’t buy Teslas never signed up to volunteer our lives as training data for FSD.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      reading this, I am scared how dulled I have become to the danger posed from my 45 minute daily commute back from work. 65 kilometer driving into the black at 100km/h

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          The cameras alone should be able to see IR. There’s filters over most digital cameras to prevent that, but no reason to do it here.

          Tesla is just advertising technology that isn’t ready, and people are dying as a result.

          • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            And its also always to have multiple layers of defence. Its straight up stupid to remove the redundancy in safety measures because you trust your tech.

            • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Not only redundancy, but different types of sensors actually serve different purposes because they excel at different tasks.

          • fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            For any camera to see IR, there must be IR light there to be seen. LIDAR and proximity sensors emit their own light, but TIL tesla doesn’t have any… Great tech…my 300€ vacuum bot has LIDAR… Ofc it doesn’t go 130KM/h in the dark, but I was 99.99% sure any self-driving car had the bare minimum of sensors, but I guess Tesla isn’t one of them.

      • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sensors that the Tesla famously doesn’t have (afaik, didn’t check) because Elon is a dumbass.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      In the day, we sweat it out on the streets

      Of a runaway American dream

      At night we ride through the mansions of glory

      In the suicide machines

      “Born to Ride” - Bruce Springsteen

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The day he said that “ReGULAr CAmErAs aRe ALl YoU NeEd” was the day I lost all trust in their implementation. And I’m someone who’s completely ready to turn over all my driving to an autopilot lol

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I believe we can make a self-driving car with only optical sensors that performs as well as a human someday. I don’t think today is that day, or that we shouldn’t aim for self-driving to be far better than human drivers.

  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Tesla’s approach to automotive autonomy is a unique one: Rather than using pesky sensors, which cost money, the company has instead decided to rely only on the output from the car’s cameras. Its computers analyze every pixel, crunch through tons of data, and then apparently decide to just plow into deer and keep on trucking.

    • Demdaru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I mean, to be honest…if you are about to hit a deer on the road anyway, speed up. Higher chance the scrawny fucker will get yeeted over you after meeting your car, rather than get juuuuust perfectly booped into air to crash through windshield and into your face.

      Official advice I heard many times. Prolly doesn’t apply if you are going slow.

      Edit: Read further down. This advice is effing outdated, disregard. -_- God I am happy I’ve never had to put it i to test.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Haven’t read down yet, but I bet odds are a bit better if you let go of the brake just before impact, to raise the front up a bit.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    So, a kid on a bicycle or scooter is an edge case? Fuck the Muskrat and strip him of US citizenship for illegally working in the USA. Another question. WTF was the driver doing?

    • M600@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      In regards to the deer, it looks like it might have been hard to see for the driver. I remember learning in driversED that it is better to hit the animal instead of swerving to miss it as it might hit a car to your side, so maybe that is what they were thinking?

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Drivers Ed does not however say to ignore the brakes, either trying to avoid a collision. Especially to ignore the brakes after having hit something.

  • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The one thing I will say is this isn’t a human… Deer probably aren’t in their training data at near the rates humans are.

    It’s definitely still concerning, but also still maybe more trustworthy than some human drivers. We seriously give licenses to too many people. Within the last week I’ve seen a guy that went into the other lane by like 4’ multiple times and I also saw a lady who blocked 2 lanes of traffic so she could make an illegal U turn on a 4 lane city street (rather than you know turning off on a side street/one of many nearby parking lots and turning around).

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Deer and other animals are extremely common on rural roads. If they don’t have enough training data then they are being willfully incompetent.

  • pdxfed@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    You just need to buy the North America Animal Recognition AI subscription and this wouldn’t be an issue plebs, it will stop for 28 out of 139 mammals!