• Teknikal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve noticed reddit has recently started shadowbanning my posts when I have a vpn active so I’d say at this point it’s probably completely unsafe to discuss anything on.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I for one want to be in compliance. Here is my IP, I checked it in Microsoft windows so it is correct. 192.168.0.1

    Text me at that IP if I need to pay a fine or if I need to go to my local jail. Thanks guys, I’m sorry I pirated and I will re upload all the movie films that I downloaded to try to make this right.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    For the third time in less than a year, film studios with copyright infringement complaints against a cable Internet provider are trying to force Reddit to share information about users who have discussed piracy on the site.

    In the first instance, US Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler ruled in the US District Court for the Northern District of California that the First Amendment right to anonymous speech meant Reddit didn’t have to disclose the names, email addresses, and other account registration information for nine Reddit users.

    Film companies, including Bodyguard Productions and Millennium Media, had subpoenaed Reddit in relation to a patent infringement lawsuit against Astound Broadband-owned RCN about subscribers allegedly pirating 34 movie titles, including Hellboy (2019), Rambo V: Last Blood, and Tesla.

    In her ruling, Beeler noted that while the First Amendment right to anonymous speech is not absolute, the film producers had already received the names of 118 Grande subscribers.

    She also said the film producers had failed to prove that “the identifying information is directly or materially relevant or unavailable from another source.”

    This week, as reported by TorrentFreak, film companies Voltage Holdings, which are part of the previous two subpoenas, and Screen Media Ventures, another film studio with litigation against RCN, filed a motion to compel [PDF] Reddit to respond to the subpoena in the US District Court for the Northern District of California.


    The original article contains 588 words, the summary contains 228 words. Saved 61%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Man that place. I know it’s cliche to talk about it like talking about your ex on a date, but I posted there for good reason.

      I found the solution to a rare bug that was bothering a group of people. I posted the solution, and my account was immediately banned sitewide for violating the terms of service, whatever that means.

      I thought to myself: yeah… it was a mistake coming here. Leave it to the bots to have conversations with themselves.

  • hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Literally illegal. Discussing crimes doesn’t equal crime, so there’s no reason for them to requeust IPs. And at least in the EU you aren’t even allowed to disclose information related to your person.

    • spiderman@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      even if they have our ip addresses, they can’t take any legal actions for discussing about piracy right?

      • hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Not unless you talk about how you will commit or have committed a specific instance of piracy. E.g. “I downloaded back to the future last night from (insert website)”. Then they have reasonable suspicion and can start to subpoena.

        Obligatory IANAL. Always do research and ask in lawyer if you wanna talk specifics.

    • 800XL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      If discussing crimes equals crime then police, CEOs, and politicians should all be in jail.

      • hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I could give you a full breakdown of how it works in EU, but basically there needs to be indisputable evidence that a crime occured for any party to subpoena any ISP or service provider company. Otherwise those companies will be in huge trouble. The one doing the subpoena because they wouldn’t have an order for that and if they fuck around right before suing, courts will not take kindly to that. And the other receiving the subpoena for disclosing personal information (although they’d maybe win a defense to that, because if they did their due diligence they are not supposed to tank the damages).

        What I’m saying is, considering currently laws in the EU, I think we’re good. Of course IANAL so ask one if you need specific advice.

        • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Did they actually issue a subpoena though, or did they just send some emails saying “give pls”.

          A subpoena is a legal document and thus there are rules that go along with it. But an email asking to be given something is not a subpoena.

    • SGG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      They don’t care. It’s the film industry equivalent to the Microsoft support scammers. Get a bunch of targets, spam out hundreds of thousands of threatening emails, profit off the small percent of people who fall for it.

      • vrek@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I had a Microsoft support scammer once… I let him in to my system too…well not really.

        I quickly spin up a quick fresh install of slack ware Linux in a virtual machine that didn’t even have x11 never mind wine installed. When it was up I told him a friend uses something called tellynet (aka telnet but I was playing dumb) to help me on the computer.

        He telnetted in and could not understand why any of his malware wasn’t working…

        • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          uses something called tellynet (aka telnet but I was playing dumb)

          I wonder if he got the joke, or was a scriptkiddie who just relies on existing tools without understanding them, and thought you meant television or similar.

          • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            They’re basically telemarketing workers with hacking tools provided by an employer. They follow scripts and click the buttons they’ve been trained to use.

            I’m surprised they got in with telnet and not their usual RDP. However I’m not sure they would have gotten anywhere on a Linux box with commands that are so different, unless they were a little familiar with at least MacOS (bash or zsh based now a days).

    • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      You should read the article. I don’t agree with them, but it’s more nuanced than that/isn’t about discussing piracy.

      They are basically trying to get the IP‘s so that they can claim frontier is at fault and not being proactive. It is not actually targeting the users in a way that is designed to go after them individually. It’s trying to prove users are using frontier to pirate with impunity.

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Great explanation, it’s what I was hoping to write until my lemmy client crashed with the unfinished comment.

        I’m curious what would happen if some copyright holder tried to get information about a user on lemmy. Iirc only the users instance could log their IP, but almost all instances are run by volunteers, so risking a lawsuit might no be viable. Just look at what Tachiyomi devs have to go through, even though all they’re doing was and is legal.

        • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          I am very much against this and totally agree. I think this could open some really dangerous doors re: internet privacy.

          Wear a VPN, folks.

      • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s not really extra nuance, and is about discussing piracy.

        The premise that an ISP has an obligation to proactively monitor traffic when they shouldn’t even legally be permitted to do so is disgusting.

        • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          I literally said I don’t agree with them lol but the point is they aren’t trying to figure out who is discussing piracy on Reddit. They are trying to implicate frontier. Again, I don’t agree. I am against this.

          • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            That’s not a meaningful distinction.

            They’re still trying to take action against discussion of piracy. The target does not matter and is not meaningful to the discussion.

            • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              What? That is incredibly meaningful. The legal implications are are very distinct, and also open some pretty frightening doors.

              If we can’t even distinguish the legal channels they are trying to screw us with, how can we possibly protect Internet privacy?

              I get you want to win an Internet argument or whatever but let’s keep our eye on the ball here, dude

              • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                The important legal concept is that it’s literally impossible for discussion of piracy to entitle them to any information in any possible context.

                The target of their harassment does not matter. Giving them a single bit of data is every bit as unconditionally unacceptable in either case, and you don’t get to any ruling on anything else unless you bypass that.

                • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Again, this isn’t about the discussions. They are taking IP’s discussing it and tracing them to frontier. They’re “moving upstream” instead of targeting users, which means they need less info,the discussion themselves are immaterial because they aren’t targeting individuals - which means it’s more likely. This is a different tactic.

  • KuroeNekoDemon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I believe under the first amendment in the US Constitution and section 2 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada you cannot silence someone’s freedom of speech/expression just because they discussed something you don’t like. This legal claim is bullshit right from the start due to constitutional protections

  • snownyte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    So, okay.

    Let’s say these film studios DO get ‘permission’ or ‘access’ of these IPs. Haven’t we already proven in the court of law that IP Address does not equal a person? How come that is? Well, it’s because people can hide under VPNs, they could use proxies, they could use open wi-fi, they can change their address by ISP request .etc

    They aren’t assigned permanent IPs and they aren’t tied to their IPs through identity.

    This whole effort is just a waste of their time, proving once again, that they’re desperate for anything.

    On the other hand, the r/piracy subreddit is full of entitled jackasses who pick you apart for stupid arbitrary reasons. I’ve posted news posts on there before as a means to inform the pirating community as to what to look for in case things could go wrong in the future, as a lead. And any time, people kept commenting like “WHUT DUS DIS HAVE TU DU WITH PIWACY?!” every fucking time.

    I’d spell it out for them, I get downvoted, I get my post reported and it’s removed. Seriously, fuck all of those e-begging pieces of shit.

    • 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      IPs alone aren’t enough. IPs tied with usernames can be a lot more compelling.

      • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Legally, not really. A username is also not a person.

        This is a fishing expedition by the producers, nothing more.

        From the article:

        Another reason Reddit refuses to comply with the film producers’ request is that “none of the posts depicted in Exhibit A to the subpoena appear to relate to movies that we understand are the subject of" the copyright infringement claims.

        The users made no reference to pirating IP owned by the producers.

        • 520@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Legally, not really. A username is also not a person.

          True, but when tied to an IP address known to be used by a suspected person, it can be used as evidence.

          Also if the Reddit account is old, there’s a good chance they provided at least one piece of identifying info that further ties that account to a target.

          It’s not definitive but it is a lot harder to toss out

    • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe I am wrong but it seems like some of y’all aren’t reading the article. They aren’t going after IP’s in order to identify the individuals. They are trying to prove that frontier is not being proactive in their efforts to prevent piracy. The IP’s are to prove that it is going through frontier. Reddit->Frontier->Pirated content.

      I am not saying I am ok with that, because I’m not, but what many of y’all are describing is happening is not exactly what is happening here.

      • snownyte@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Buddy, go bitch at the author who wrote the article that plastered all over what we’re responding about.

        • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          What? I’m saying y’all are either misunderstanding the contents of the article or you aren’t reading it. It explains this quite clearly.

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    oh, boy, am I ever glad I overwrote all of my comments before deleting my account…

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    They are going about it the wrong way with reddit. All they gotta do is show the $$$$ and spez will bend right over with that information. After all that’s all he seems to see.

    • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      They’re not just capitalists, they’re oligarchs. They feel entitled to that private information and they don’t care how much “campaign contributions” they have to give to get what they want.

  • imkali@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Why should I care about their privacy policy?” If Reddit doesn’t store this info then they can’t give it to the film studios.

  • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    You ain’t gonna get mine, you fuckers.

    Proton VPN with port forwarding turned off…Or Mullvad with quantum secure encryption…whichever you want.

      • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        A lot of people still don’t and they use public wifi too. And some people with VPNs are using shitty ones like nord, express or Private internet access or surfshark

        Surfshark and nord are owned by the same company and express and PIA are owned by the same company. So PIA isn’t trustworthy anymore, their court proven no-logs policy isn’t valid anymore because they got bought out since then.