Israel, the United States and Hamas are close to an agreement to free dozens of women and children held hostage in Gaza, in exchange for the first sustained pause in conflict in Gaza, according to people familiar with its provisions.

    • Uranium3006@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      don’t shame people into voting for shit, fix your bad candidate problem. bad candidates scare off swing voters in the suburbs worse than progressive candidates

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I will not vote for genocide. That’s my red line. If you vote for the lesser of two genocides you’re still voting for genocide.

      If Biden actually manages to stop Israel from continuing its genocide he has my vote! That’s all it would take and that is not a high bar.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So you vote for nothing and the worst of the two gets in anyway. The family who would’ve otherwise lived in the ‘lesser genocide’ thanks you. In what realm does that make sense?

        • osarusan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          These “red line” commenters are so blinded by their own purity tests that they can’t see they’re actually supporting the greater genocide. Every thread here on lemmy is full of them, and they all make the same case, but they refuse to acknowledge the actual reality, which is that not voting for the one person who has an actual chance to beat Trump, they’re actually supporting him. Not as much as they would if they actually voted for him, but still significantly.

          If Trump wins by a narrow margin, it will be because of these red-liners who valued their own purity over the lives of others.

            • osarusan@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              In a way, there’s an argument to be made there. If you’re not doing everything you can to help defeat evil, then you are allowing that evil some amount of support.

              On the other hand, your vote is black and white. By not voting for the one person who has an actual chance to beat Trump, your actions are inarguably are supporting Trump.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Your money is black and white too. By not donating to the one person that has an actual chance to beat Trump, your actions are unarguably supporting Trump. Similarly! By not volunteering your time to the one person that has an actual chance to beat Trump…

                Zero. Difference.

                • Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You could argue he’s donating his time right now trying to sway people in a public forum and getting them to think I support for his candidate of the lesser of two evils.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Trump is already talking about basically ethnically cleansing the us in the context of mass deportation of immigrants and other parts of his “platform”.

        It is less “voting for the lesser of two genocides”. It is preventing the ones you can.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          And by threatening to withhold my vote I’m trying to prevent further genocide in Gaza. We’ve already forced Biden this far, we can force him farther if he realizes it could cost him the election.

          So, no ceasefire, no votes.

          By voting blue-no-matter-who, you’re just making Biden worse.

          • eoddc5@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If Biden doesn’t get the ceasefire, you won’t vote for him

            But who would you vote for, then?

            No other candidates, Democrat or Republican, that run again Biden will be able to get the ceasefire, either - come time to vote.

            So….you won’t vote at all?

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’ll vote downticket for Democrats and write Hillary Clinton in to the Presidential spot.

              Democrats in the House and Senate would rein in Trump and it’s still Her turn!!!

              • eoddc5@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not against her as a candidate, but you know writing her in will just waste a vote.

                There’s also no promise that if she were in the potus seat right now that she could definitively broker a ceasefire. We don’t know how any of it would work with anyone else.

                Let’s give Biden a chance.

                (Btw im all for voting for another deserving candidate who runs against him on the Democratic ticket)

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I’m giving Biden a chance right now. He has almost an entire fucking year to pull this off.

                  The pressure is already adding up, you can’t say that Democrats haven’t budged on this issue. It’s working.

                  Keep up the pressure. No ceasefire, no votes.

              • PugJesus@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Clinton. You’d vote for Clinton in this theoretical scenario as to who would get your vote in negotiating a ceasefire as president during this crisis.

                The Hillary Clinton who has expressly opposed a ceasefire during this very crisis.

                That Clinton.