• ArchAengelus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    As an engineer:

    1. Receive or identify a problem.
    2. Design a solution that solves or mitigated the problem.
    3. Usually pay someone to make a prototype or do it ourselves
    4. Test the prototype and see if it solves the problem. If no, go back to #2 until a workable solution is found
    5. Get someone else to build the final thing.
    6. Make sure thing works. Ship it.

    This is a recursive and iterative process. Meaning you will find problems inside your solutions and need to fix them.

    Eventually you finish the thing and get a new problem and do the whole game over again. It’s like a puzzle that requires absurd amounts of knowledge to play well, but anyone could try to solve the problem. That’s why good engineers are paid pretty well.

    • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That’s a pretty good run down. There’s all sorts of soft skills required for that as well, and hard skills specific to the industry they’re in, but I think you’ve got the essence of it. Also in step 6, add: “take responsibility for everything that will go wrong with thing in the future” aka “sign off”.

  • WagnasT@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I put the data in excel and make colorful charts to show management that their ideas are possible but expensive. Then do the same to show the cost of not purchasing maintenance equipment is in fact more costly than the necessary equipment.

  • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    “The Engineering Method” by Mark Hammond aka the engineer guy is a great read…

    …is what I would say if I actually purchased books from my wishlist.

  • zout@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m an engineer. Most of the time I solve the tricky technical problems. Other times I design some new technical thing, or I think of new ways to do something.

    • copernicurious@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Scientists make something new. One time. In a lab. Under ideal conditions. With 3 PhDs assembling, testing, and running it.

      Engineers have to make the same thing so that their cheap-ass company can hire any gaggle of idiots off any street around the world and train them to assemble, test, and run 500 of the thing.

      Alternatively so those same idiots can buy the product and do all manner of stupid things to it without it breaking.

      Note: not saying all technicians are idiots, but the good ones get paid more so companies eventually go for the idiots instead.

  • ted@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I started my engineering program at University not knowing what engineering was.

    Thank goodness for that orientation session.