• pelya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Yes they do. See the long-standing debate over the ban to export crypto algorithms to Iran.

    • priapus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      As they said in the article, they are just listening to their lawyers. I would assume those lawyers are correct.

          • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            Lawyers will also usually advice the safer option. Even if your actions are legal, if its boarderline enough you have to defend your actions in court, its expensive and risky.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Lawyers will be honest or dishonest, just depending on what’s best for the person who is paying them. Their jobs are dependent on getting good outcomes for their clients, so they can most definitely be trusted if you are the one paying them.

        • daggermoon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Lawyer slander is so fucking stupid. Would you not want a lawyer on your side if it was your ass on the line? A lawyer’s job isn’t to judge wrong or right. It’s to convince a judge or jury of one’s innocence. A lawyer has to defend the morally fucked the same as they do the innocent. You can’t have one without the other.

          I know this isn’t a criminal proceeding or anything of the sort but I sense that’s what the comment was referring to.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        That’s a generic fuck you, I don’t need to explain myself.

        Which does make me question their reasoning even more tbh