13% of Democrats agree with Trump on that.

What the actual fuck?

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    When Chinese immigrants started pouring into California during the Gold Rush era, the response wasn’t, “immigrants are poisoning the blood of our country!”

    Chinese Exclusion Act says hi.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Okay, fair point. But that wasn’t really a “poisoning the blood of our country” thing either. It was a “they tuk’r jerbs” situation.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh, no, there was definitely strong fears at the time that foreigners would ‘ruin’ America, and blood-related arguments were far more in vogue then than now. Even foreigners as white as the Irish and Germans.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It was a ‘catholics are evil and all follow the commands of the pope so we can’t let them in, they’ll sell us all out to the European powers’ thing.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not just fleeing debt or crimes. People tend to be pretty well familiar with the British Empire using Australia as a penal colony, but that didn’t really get going until after the American Revolution. Before that they just used the 13 Colonies. Not quite as far to travel, bit cheaper.

          We’ve largely blotted out that particular perception, though, replacing it with pilgrims in funny hats fleeing religious persecution. Which, there were those too, of course, but there was also quite a lot of every other sort of person.