• Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Honda is also aiming for optimum battery efficiency through its use of e-Axles, a system consisting of a motor, inverter, and gearbox that converts electric power into energy for driving.

    This is revolutionary, folks: e-Axles! Can you believe it? They made an electric car!

    They’re describing an electric car.

    Then they gave it a fancy proprietary name so gullible tech writers think it’s Technology™️ and regurgitate their ad copy as news articles.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        So it’s basically a fancy Technology™️ term for a layout decision which was called motor on axle for decades until a marketing department decided they needed some Innovation™️, and this tech writer described it so poorly I couldn’t even identify it even though I’ve programmed quad motor torque vectoring systems myself. Electric motors have this interesting property where they require such little support - basically a couple of power wires and some sensors - that they can scale to any size with very little overhead, and so you can do 4 motors. That’s it, electric cars give you this possibility for free.

        “Motor-on-axle” is descriptive and helpful. In fact it’s too descriptive, because it reveals that nothing special is going on. “e-Axle” is opaque nonsense for gullible tech writers, and this one tried to make it sound special but ended up opting for such a vague language that they literally just described an electric car.

        This entire article is just ad-copy. It’s fashion writing for tech nerds.

  • Seraph@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    We need some more future cars like this.

    Why does all our shit looks like someone just smoothed out the cars from the 90s?

    • verysoft@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because the “smoothed out the cars from the 90s” are practical, serviceable and (American pickups aside) not gargantuan space hogs.

    • funkajunk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because making cars more aerodynamic was way easier than making ICEs more efficient.

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I really wish car companies would actually release production models that looked like the concept models. These look so goddamn cool.

    • bluGill@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      No you don’t. They look cool and get you thinking you want them. However if you ever had to live with them instead of just looking you would quickly discover some of those cool looking things make for very annoying compromises and so you wouldn’t want them.

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          lol, my first car was a Jeep. Fun car.

          never bought another one, though.

          • GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I bought a Wrangler new for $27k, hit two trees with it while offroading, lost its spare key, and sold it without working heat 8 years later for 18k. 10/10, would do that again.

            Though honestly, I probably wouldnt buy one again either. My wife and I want a light truck for house projects and her short commute, an EV for travel and my commute, and then I’d love a Polaris or something for fun. A Jeep ain’t any of those

            • gregorum@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              I bought a Wrangler new for $27k

              '96-’01?

              given your story, it sounds like you did your best to drive that thing into the ground (not judging). I’m glad you had fun with it, as that’s what they’re for, although, you probably would have gotten many more years out of it had you actually driven it like a car and on the street (also, regular maintenance). just sayin’.

              given your follow-up, it was obviously not a long-term choice (is it for anyone?), and I’m glad you’ve found what works for you. I discovered that my vehicle of choice is the NYC Subway! But, fuck, I REALLY miss my 2001 Honda Accord EX Coupe! That car was the shit!

              • GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                '13, sold in 2021, hence the inflated value haha.

                I make it sound worse than it was. It was as sound as can be drivetrain wise, and every upgrade was carefully picked with a long term lifespan and serviceable parts, like a heim joint control arm set. I loved that thing, it just had cosmetic stories to tell.

                I’m glad you found your vibe too. Social phobias have me antsy in a room with more than 20 people, NYC would break me in no time. But more power to you, live the life you love.

        • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I rented a jeep (Cherokee?) for the first time recently. Literally a worse driving experience than my old 2000 Mitsubishi Galant. Which was the worst ever, prior to the jeep.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I also think they’re cool. I also wouldn’t own one because of how incredibly out of place they look.

  • Zorque@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Someone at Honda looked at the failure that is the Cybertruck and was like “Huh… not bad”

    • Bonehead@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The difference here is that the car in the picture is a concept car, which very very rarely ever makes it to production as is. The Cybertruck is the exception to that rule…

  • AbackDeckWARLORD@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just make a regular looking car that happens to be EV. I don’t know why manufacturers have to make the dumbest looking vehicles for their EV cars.

    • Ultragramps@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Lots of visibility with such a small front end, but it’ll make head-on collisions scarier, also, imo. Looks aerodynamic, too. I’d have no issue rocking this for my daily.

    • ex10n@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m with you on this. I feel like manufacturers still feel like people are wanting to make a statement by making EVs look like their suited for spaceflight. I’d rather have near similar looking models to what we’ve already got with the combustion engine, with aerodynamic considerations for efficiency baked in.

  • The Barto@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I really hope that back end is the charging port and you get to park you car like one of those toy cars that you you ‘charge’ up and fire across the room.

  • Critical_Insight@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Continuing the trend of completely butchering the rear end of the vehicle as is the case with many other modern cars aswell.