A Florida man has pleaded guilty in connection with threatening to kill a Supreme Court justice.

The guilty plea from 43-year-old Neal Brij Sidhwaney of Fernandina Beach stemmed from a call he made to a Supreme Court justice in July, the Justice Department said in a news release Monday.

He faces up to five years in federal prison on one count of transmitting an interstate threat. A sentencing date has not yet been set.

Prosecutors said that Sidhwaney identified himself by name in an expletive-infused voicemail and repeatedly threatened to kill the Supreme Court justice, who is not named in court documents.

Sidhwaney warned that if the justice alerted deputy U.S. Marshals, he would talk to them and “come kill you anyway,” according to court documents, which did not indicate what prompted Sidhwaney to make the threat.

  • eksb@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    How I feel about this very much depends on which justice he threatened to kill.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I’m mildly surprised there hasn’t been more reactionary stochastic terrorism from the left. I guess we still have optimism while the right has had it beaten out of them every day by the news and, well, I have to assume they make their own daily lives pretty miserable anyway.

      • JunkMilesDavis@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Maybe the secret ingredient is human empathy. Not that crazies are unique to the right by any means, but the organized effort to dehumanize and attack segments of the population has gone disproportionately mainstream on that side of the spectrum. So many talking points involve a vaguely-defined “enemy” of some kind. It’s unfortunate that people get sucked into it, but you can’t really blame the individuals when the leaders they look up to are actively working to mobilize them in that way as a political strategy.

        I guess the ideological space the left fills at the moment just isn’t one that requires that type of anger to support. There are certainly issues to get angry about, but in general it’s just taking that low-hanging fruit of giving your fellow humans the same respect you would want for yourself and your loved ones, even if they seem different or weird to you.

      • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The problem is that the left are the good people, lmao. That’s why it takes so long until they start pushing back. Everything has to really go to shit until the left are picking up the pitchforks. It’s a bit tragic ngl

    • naught@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Is it??? Anyone calling public servants with death threats I’m gonna go ahead and disagree with

      • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        When the SC publishes ethical rules legalizing bribery, they’re inviting anyone with a sense of justice to take matters into their own hands.

        • naught@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Shit take. Anyone calling in death threats is ethically bankrupt at the very least. What justice is there in murder?

          • Lemmygizer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            For legal purposes, this is only a joke.

            It’s really the only way for a normal person to effect the SC. They are given lifetime appointments, it doesn’t say how long those lifetimes have to be.

            Checks and balances, yo.