• aberrate_junior_beatnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Everything the Nazis did in the Third Reich was legal. People who resisted them were breaking the law. Maybe we should evaluate things by their impact (pollution/invasion of privacy) rather than their legality.

          • ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I like how you say that as if its impossible.

            I stopped buying things off of Amazon many years ago because they don’t respect privacy and are unethical.

            • Engywook@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well done. Same here.

              Now, please actively bother other people (IRL family and friend, not strangers on the internet) they must do the same.

              People here on the Fedi seem so eager to teach others what is best for them.

          • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You said, “One thing is illegal, the other is not,” which is directly equating legality with ethics/morality.

            Edit: If I’m somehow misinterpreting this statement, then perhaps you can explain how legality is relevant here?

            • Engywook@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I fail to see the lack of morality on chosing a browser over another. People use what works best for them. If for most people what works best is Chrome, well, I don’t feel there’s anything wrong in their choice. Buring tires “is wrong” regardlessly.