LOS ANGELES (AP) — A new California law that bans people from carrying firearms in most public places was once again blocked from taking effect Saturday as a court case challenging it continues.

A 9th Circuit Court of Appeals panel dissolved a temporary hold on a lower court injunction blocking the law. The hold was issued by a different 9th Circuit panel and had allowed the law to go into effect Jan. 1.

Saturday’s decision keeps in place a Dec. 20 ruling by U.S. District Judge Cormac Carney blocking the law. Carney said that it violates the Second Amendment and that gun rights groups would likely prevail in proving it unconstitutional.

The law, signed by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, prohibits people from carrying concealed guns in 26 types of places including public parks and playgrounds, churches, banks and zoos. The ban applies regardless of whether a person has a concealed carry permit.

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Come on people… they need to make the world a safe place for cowards too! You can’t expect these chicken-shit NRA clowns to walk amongst the populous without being strapped, can you?

  • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    ~13 people in the US have died from a "shooting"during 8 separate events 7 days into 2024, another ~30 injured.

    I’m also not saying state enforced concealed carry bans are the way, but you guys gotta do something.

    About half were murder suicides, a quarter were drive-by shootings and the last quarter were bar/party fights.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sadly were stuck between “ban guns” and “ban banning guns” with little to no consideration for the underlying issues.

      I guess that’s too hard a platform to campaign on, though

      • Ooops@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Common sense, data and actual arguments? Yes, those are completely useless as a platform since post-factual populism has replaced real politics.

    • GluWu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      How many of those shootings were committed by someone who has a CHL? How many are committed by felons or criminals who are already prohibited from carrying any guns anywhere?

      • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, it’s nuts how weak this California bill was and we can’t even that passed. Legit pathetic.

        Can’t imagine having to raise kids in this country. Parents are brave, not giving a shit about all the legal guns

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    A policeman sees a drunk man searching for something under a streetlight and asks what the drunk has lost. He says he lost his keys and they both look under the streetlight together. After a few minutes the policeman asks if he is sure he lost them here, and the drunk replies, no, and that he lost them in the park. The policeman asks why he is searching here, and the drunk replies, “this is where the light is”.

    Concealed-carry permit holders aren’t the ones who commit gun crimes, but because they’re the ones who actually follow the law, they’re the ones that are targeted by these draconian rules.

    In California, no shooting by a CCW holder has ever occurred at an existing protected location or one proposed by SB 2. In fact, concealedcarrykillers.org lists just 5 homicides having been committed by CCW holders in California in the last 24 years.

    • 11181514@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      So draconian that I don’t want someone to bring a gun to a public playground or the fucking zoo.

      no shooting by a CCW holder has ever occurred at an existing protected location

      Oh wow maybe the ban works? Noooo it’s definitely because you scared idiots carrying weapons around all day are just SO responsible.

      Hey you know who’s 100% responsible for all gun violence? PEOPLE WITH GUNS.

      • butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        “Subset X of large group Y has committed a negligible amount of crime Y in the last generation.”

        “NO YOU IDIOT, LARGE GROUP Y DOES ALL OF CRIME Y, JUST THINK!!!”

        • 11181514@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Oh sorry I forgot only a subset of the people that own a thing made to kill other people actually kill other people. Good point go ahead and bring those guns hidden in your pants to a kids park or whatever. I feel so much safer now.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      draconian laws

      If the US has shown the world one thing then it is that the only rule that will really work is an absolute no-exception ban on firearms.

      Eric and Dylan have been dead for what, 20 years now, and what has changed? It. Got. Worse. They were amateurs compared to what followed. The Las Vegas shooting was beyond amazing and would have been prevented if weapons like these are only available on the black market for a million dollar with bullets costing 1000 bucks a pop. The crazies won’t be able to afford it and the very VERY few criminals that can afford guns and want to take that risk won’t be crazy enough to start shooting around at random innocent citizens and or bystanders.

      This shit only happens when weapons (and more importantly, bullets) are available freely and CHEAPLY.

      At this point, I’d say the US has had their chance.

      This entire “but we need weapons to overthrow evil governments!” claim is absolute horse shit, exhibit A being the day before yesterday, a year ago… Those same idiots always parrotting about overthrowing evil governments trying to overthrow a legitimate government so that they can install a dictatorship.

      The US has shown the world year after year that it’s citizens cannot responsibly handle firearms, period. Yes, I know, guns are cool toys, BUT FUCKING CHILDREN ARE DYING BY THE THOUSANDS.

      Sucks for those few that are responsible, you can thank all the incels and what not, but you won’t be able to shoot them for what they did, we’ll be taking those guns, thank you.

      PROHIBIT ALL GUNS IN THE US

    • rosymind@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      My husband (one of the most trustworthy and responsible people I know- flaws and all) has been talking about getting a concealed-carry permit.

      My argument against it, is that if there is an active shooter and he also pulls out his gun to take them out, the cops or other permit-owners might not realize that he’s the “good guy” and he (or I, if I’m nearby) could get shot instead.

      He went silent, and seemed to spend a lot of time thinking about it after I’d shared my thoughts. Thus far he hasn’t tried to obtain one

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s always a risk, but the instructors have tips to mitigate this risk. Chief amongst them, and this one is for bystanders, give a description of the shooter if you’re the one calling. The police responding having at least sort of a picture can help everyone. If you see a defender give a description of them as well if possible. Second, for the defender, you are NOT obligated to stay at the scene if you feel it is unsafe. Get the hell out, holster it otw out if you’re sure there’s no second shooter, call the cops and say you had to defend yourself and you’ll turn yourself in, immediately call your lawyer, and listen to them, they’ll guide you from there. If you feel it is safe and you’re staying, same as above, holster, cops, lawyer. If there is a second shooter you are not obligated to try and kill him, but if you do it may be smarter to reholster and keep a hand on the grip simply for this exact reason (and as always don’t be stupid, peek corners, use cover, watch for trailing accomplices, etc, but a lot of that comes from a different trainer. Frankly unless you’ve taken classes beyond the bare minimum CCW that teaches what to do if you have to use it legal-wise, it may be the smarter move to not pursue if you can get to an exit.) It’s certainly something you’d have to prepare for beforehand, you can’t just go all “John Wick” without all the IDPA training Keanu actually does (and of course even then it’s a movie lol.)

          /adhd

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Using your pistol in a mass shooting event is an edge-case of an edge-case. Even if you’re carrying, run, hide, fight is still the correct strategy. The way bigger concern is that you’ll shoot yourself or a loved one. There are things you can and should do to mitigate your accident/suicide/murder risk, but that’s really the thing you should be worried about.

        Anyway, if you find yourself within shooting distance, yeah, calmly shoot back and run. The immediate threat of getting shot by the mass shooter is more pressing than potentially being misidentified as the perpetrator even just minutes later. It’s incredibly unlikely you’ll be confronted by the shooter exactly when the cops show up, making yourself a potential target.

        Anyway, again, there’s loads more probable things you need to worry about when it comes to CCW than a mass shooter.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    From a sub comment, but i think it should have its own thread in this post:

    If the US has shown the world one thing then it is that the only rule that will really work is an absolute no-exception ban on firearms.

    Eric and Dylan have been dead for what, 20 years now, and what has changed? It. Got. Worse. They were amateurs compared to what followed. The Las Vegas shooting was beyond amazing and would have been prevented if weapons like these are only available on the black market for a million dollar with bullets costing 1000 bucks a pop. The crazies won’t be able to afford it and the very VERY few criminals that can afford guns and want to take that risk won’t be crazy enough to start shooting around at random innocent citizens and or bystanders.

    This shit only happens when weapons (and more importantly, bullets) are available freely and CHEAPLY.

    At this point, I’d say the US has had their chance.

    This entire “but we need weapons to overthrow evil governments!” claim is absolute horse shit, exhibit A being the day before yesterday, a year ago… Those same idiots always parrotting about overthrowing evil governments trying to overthrow a legitimate government so that they can install a dictatorship.

    The US has shown the world year after year that it’s citizens cannot responsibly handle firearms, period. Yes, I know, guns are cool toys, BUT FUCKING CHILDREN ARE DYING BY THE THOUSANDS.

    Sucks for those few that are responsible, you can thank all the incels and what not, but you won’t be able to shoot them for what they did, we’ll be taking those guns, thank you.

    PROHIBIT ALL GUNS IN THE US