• ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s the courts themselves that would have to break them up, so it’s not an issue there. It’s just a very high bar to clear because the courts don’t care about anticompetitive practices unless it has a detrimental effect on the consumer. You’d be hard pressed to argue that things like YouTube and Gmail coupled with the cloud service, the ad service and the phone service are causing actual harm to the consumer that competition wouldn’t. I don’t see how YouTube would survive in its current form if it used third party ads, hosting, and CDN. That said, I wouldn’t be sad to see it burn in a fire either.

  • fne8w2ah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Good. But let’s not pretend they won’t merge back like what the Baby Bells did back in the early aughts.

    • unphazed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      They get around it I think because they never seem to buy more than 45% shares… just they literally own a percentage of damn near every company

  • Jackcooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago
    1. Aetna CVS Caremark
    2. Cigna Express Scripts
    3. fucking ticketmaster
    4. Google
    5. Kroger (and they want to merge AGAIN?)

    Let’s start here for now

  • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’ll be ecstatic if that happens, but I won’t hold my breath. It should have been done a long time ago for so many mega corpos, but here we are.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Considering

      Investigating

      Discussing

      Will put forward a possibility of

      Listen, its this government or we go with the GOP version where its just the MOVE bombing every couple of weeks, while the DOJ issues briefs about busting open a child’s testicles to get information out of his father.

      Do Nothing or Do Something Awful. Those are your choices.

    • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      The trail went really really badly for Google. I know it’s trendy to be all nihilist with regards to government competence but they’d make way more other powerful corporations angry if they didn’t break up Google.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Agreed.

      No f’in way this happens, especially not in the same week when Kamala Harris goes on national TV to say she’s a capitalist.

      With that said, I still hope they try. It should be inconvenient at least to run a monopoly.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        especially not in the same week when Kamala Harris goes on national TV to say she’s a capitalist.

        You can rest assured that that is a meticulously prepared statement to curry favor and win elections in specific areas, and nothing to do with her personal ideology or how she will run things as President.

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’d love to believe that, but Democrats have ruled as pro-corporate assholes for 40 years now. The last Dem we had with the balls to oppose corporate rule was LBJ.

        • TeenieBopper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Look, I’m voting for Harris, and even as a leftist I’m half excited by it. But let’s not pretend a mainstream democratic party politician is anything other than a capitalist. She might have good policy ideas, ones that will genuinely help people, but she’s still a capitalist.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        It should be inconvenient at least to run a monopoly.

        The our government can do is make mega corpos pay lawyers … So at least we got some extra jobs out of it 🤡

        Since they are creating extra jobs shouldn’t government reward them with state aid for it?!

  • Peffse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Google saw this coming years ago. That’s why they restructured, clearly defining their different services, and became Alphabet.

  • IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    As much as I want this to happen, I fear it’ll drag on for years and then never happen or end up watered down where they split the company and manage them independently (a bit like BT in the UK but still owned by Alphabet.

        • captainWhatsHisName@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          I’m guessing this because the current investigation is happening under Biden and she is likely to have similar basic antitrust goals for DOJ.

          I’m certain that it won’t happen if Trump is elected because he’s anti-regulation in general and specifically he’s extremely corrupt and easily bribed.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        A big part of the “Cheney family endorses Harris” push has been corporate flacks racking up favors with the Dem side of the aisle so Harris can replace her cabinet with people who are more business-friendly in the next term.

        They’re playing both sides. This isn’t just “Trump Wins: Things Get Worse” / “Harris Wins: Things Stay The Same Amount of Bad”.

      • firadin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        A major issue for the US is that when the president changes, the DOJ can simply elect to stop processing the suit. It’s hard to get 8 years of uninterrupted movement on an action like this.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah I will believe it when I see it. I’m not convinced that actual Teddy Roosevelt-style “trust busting” is something that is even possible in the modern US.