I’ve been inspecting this topic quite a lot and I’m a little confused now. So, we have reasons not to use Signal, reasons not to use Matrix, there were also some claims about Session being a fraught. Briar is mostly activists related (not very suitable for daily use), XMPP lacks good clients and suffers from fragmentation of protocol implementation, SimpleX is too feature-incomplete (no UnifiedPush support, big battery drain on Android, very decent desktop client without any message sync). I can’t say a lot about Threema or Wire, as I’m not very familiar with them.

So, my question is — is there any good private messenger at all? What do you think is the most acceptable option?

  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    XMPP clients are fine albeit it all, as many as they are, slightly different as is the nature of the protocol. This just means there is value in contributing to existing clients, creating new clients, or embracing progressive enhancement (which most do for example with emoji reactions just being a quoted text reply & so on) & complete feature parity is a fool’s errand if you want an exensible protocol with diversity & experimentation in the community. With the broad exception of the Conversations Compliance, there isn’t a flagship client & instead the best ideas come to the most used or most innovative clients. I use Cheogram, Profanity, Gajim, Dino, Movim at different times (& would love to create my own). The protocol is stable, healthy, & ready for proposals for improvement.

    If I compare this to the more-expensive-by-all-metrics-to-run Matrix, if it ain’t Element, you gotta problem since a vast majority of users are on it & using all of its features & no other client has anything near parity but are expected to have parity instead of allowing things to sometimes be gracefully missed or shown in a less than ideal manner as acceptable. This hurts experimentation. Good luck trying anything similar to GDPR when all nodes are design & required to duplicate all messages & attachments for all users to every server anyone in it comes from.

    The only real gotcha is the same gotcha as Matrix when using multiple clients with double-ratchet encryption (ala Signal) is that clients will expire keys that haven’t been seen in a while & is hard to get both devices retrusting one another. Turning it off & on again rarely works & requires fiddling on both ends sometimes. I really should just use PGP for encryption more often…

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The problem is that iPhone has some weird shit about push notifications and none of the high security XMPP clients I have tried seem to support them.

  • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    You will always find problems associated with every thing but here’s some recommandations :

    For a good start, Signal and his forks (molly…)

    For daily basis and better than Signal, choose SimpleX (SimpleX is only feature incomplete for the mainstream app, but in it you can send texts, voices, photos, videos, live messages, have a PP, a alias for your contacts…)

    Important stuff and activism, use Briar

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Briar is really interesting but it doesn’t work as well for a casual messager. It is a bit complex to setup and very hard to understand unless you have strong knowledge on the subject. I think it is very powerful but breaks the standard convention most messaging applications follow.

  • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Kind of limited due to there not being an iOS version, but Briar is pretty decent. It was made to be usable in repressive areas by press and other groups, as well as in areas where bad weather has taken out cell and regular wifi. Can be used with phone data, but also offline via ad-hoc wifi and bluetooth. But stuff like Signal and SimpleX are more overall useful to more people (and I think SimpleX also supports offline local immediate area of each other like wifi and bluetooth but I don’t remember atm).

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you really need it to be secure and private, and are communicating mostly with known acquaintances within a reasonable radius, with low bandwidth requirements, LoRA with encryption is the best bet.

    It is a higher bar of entry but at least you can be confident your messages won’t be intercepted in any useful form.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Have you used it before? I’m curious about how it works. I don’t personally have a use case but it seems very cool.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Use Signal or Simplex.

    Signal does require a phone number. However, as long as you understand what that means you are fine.

    • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Would recommended SimpleX over Signal if you want the “best”, but for users that are pretty new to this maybe Signal

  • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    People say this over and over “depends on your threat model” and yet people seem to have a hard time understanding that. Your threat model is “who is your adversary and what he is willing/able to do”. Your security goal is what do you want to keep from your adversary.

    As others said, if you are an activist or sth important, perhaps you might want to build a working knowledge of cryptography yourself. If you just want META not being able to see your NSFW chat with your romantic partner Signal might be more than enough. In fact, people way more relevant than me also suggest that Signal is good even for bounty hunter vulnerability reporting.

    Having said that, what bugs me most is that people think the instant messaging format as suitable for everything: activism, jobs, crimes, broadcasting 1970’s prog rock for extraterestrials , whatever lmao. Do you really want to use your phone for all that? Like, just carrying the phone around in the first place nullifies your other precautions, for all advanced threat models beyond privacy of non-critical social messaging.

    Persistent/resourceful adversaries can eventually get to you, using a set of penetration and intelligence techniques, which means, if you are involved, the convenience of messaging your partners in crime from the phone in your pocket while waiting for a bus is a convenience you probably can’t afford.

    • haroldfinch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s impossible to escape the surveillance of those three letter agencies. We only got a brief glimpse into the other side of the curtain back in 2013, and there is no idea how advanced their surveillance technologies are, so why bother for a normie?

      It’s also painstaking if not impossible to wipe all your metadata from the internet, which can later be mined to infer personal data and sold by data brokers. Not to mention that people have jobs and use their credit cards, no way even to hide the most important personal identifying information.

      So using Signal, despite being centralized, is not too bad at all. Very few people can totally sacrifice convenience for privacy.

      • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Not to mention that people have jobs and use their credit cards, no way even to hide the most important personal identifying information.

        Exactly, this is a lost cause. If you participate in society your essential data are simply out there. For most people the task is to minimize their footprint. If we are talking about evading mass surveillance, then we should take for granted that the person will be to one or another degree marginalized, or lead a fringe lifestyle.

  • delirious_owl@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Wire is the best for security (it literally won’t let you send messages unencrypted), cost (its free), privacy (no phone number required), and usability for the masses (Foss client on all the platforms, messages sync between each client like you’d expect)

    I haven’t found anything that checks all those boxes other than Wire (though I do wish we had other options that came close)

    https://Wire.com

  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    There are a few that do a good job of protecting our messages with end-to-end encryption, but no single one fits all use cases beyond that, so we have to prioritize our needs.

    Signal is pretty decent at meta-data protection (at the application level), but has a single point of failure/monitoring, requires linking a phone number to your account, can’t be self-hosted in any useful way, and is (practically speaking) bound to services run by privacy invaders like Google.

    Matrix is decentralized, self-hostable, anonymous, and has good multi-device support, but hasn’t yet moved certain meta-data into the encrypted channel.

    SimpleX makes it relatively easy to avoid revealing a single user ID to multiple contacts (queue IDs are user IDs despite the misleading marketing) and plans to implement multi-hop routing to protect meta-data better than Signal can (is this implemented yet?), but lacks multi-device support, drops messages if they’re not retrieved within 3 weeks, lacks group calls, and has an unclear future because it depends on venture capital to operate and to continue development.

    I use Matrix because it has the features that I and my contacts expect, and can route around system failures, attacks, and government interference. This means it will still operate even if political and financial landscapes change, so I can count on at least some of my social network remaining intact for a long time to come, rather than having to ask everyone to adopt a new messenger again at some point. For my use case, these things are more important than hiding who is talking to whom, so it’s a tradeoff that makes sense for me. (Also, Matrix has acknowledged the meta-data problem and indicated that they want to fix it eventually.)

    Some people have different use cases, though. Notably, whistleblowers and journalists whose safety might depend on hiding who they’re talking to should prioritize meta-data protection over things like multi-device support and long-term network resilience.

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Matrix is decentralized, self-hostable, anonymous, and has good multi-device support, but hasn’t yet moved certain meta-data into the encrypted channel.

      yet? do they have plans? I’m (relatively) a fan of their platform because of federation, but I thought that it’s not really possible, or at least a very much lot of hard work and even more to change that

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t remember the statement in the bug report verbatim, but it indicated that they intend to fix it, which is about what I had previously seen on other issues that they did subsequently fix. I expect it’s mainly a matter of prioritizing a long to-do list.

        I can’t think of a reason why it wouldn’t be possible. The protocol is continually evolving, after all, and they already moved message content to an encrypted channel that didn’t originally exist. Moving other events into it seems like a perfectly sensible next step in that direction.

        • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          I can’t think of a reason why it wouldn’t be possible

          I was in the impression that the protocol was designed with that in mind that the server can do certain things in response to certain other things happening. I think the room membership management part of the client spec writes about this.

          But yeah, this can probably change, especially that they are now doing versioning

  • dingdongitsabear@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    good messenger for what?

    if you want a solution for you and a bunch of your henchmen to coordinate and discuss totally-not-crimes with ephemeral comms, practically any E2EE solution will work; once the not-crimen is done, burn your accounts and toss the devices for good measure and you’re scot free.

    if you want a secure messenger that’s part of a widely used communication platform where you can also do normal people shit and also convert normal people to actually use it (think getting contact deets from cute boy/girl at a bar or giving yours to a business correspondent without an elaborate powerpoint presentation on how to use it) and you want to enjoy the fruits of 20+ years of continuous IM development, like having top-notch UX, battery efficiency, network resiliency, quality voice/video calls, etc., without being spied on then such a thing doesn’t exist.

    how come? meredith baxter recently stated that it costs signal $50MM/yr to run their infra. that money has to come from somewhere. if there are no advertising dolts dumping cash on spying on your social graph and convos, the remaining avenues for financing are few and far between.

    in closing, there aren’t any super awesome messengers you weren’t aware of, everything is shit.