Today several users reported that a handful of significant Cartoon Network shows—including Ben 10, Steven Universe, Regular Show, the 2016 Powerpuff Girls revival, Amazing World of Gumball, We Bare Bears, and Chowder—were suddenly no longer streaming on Max with the turn of the month, with no prior announcement of their impending removal.

Just removing Steven Universe alone seems insane to me. I’m not into it, but it has a massive fan base.

  • Omega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    From my understanding, Max has to pay every time the show is viewed. So there’s a calculation they have, how many subscribers will they lose by removing it?

    For reference, they removed Westworld.

    • David_Eight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Max pays who? Warmer Bros owns both Max and Cartoon Network. Are they legit paying themselves, that’s so stupid it must be true.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      But… wouldn’t that “take up” the views of other shows?

      In other words, the consumer has X amount of time for HBO Max, so they’d either be paying for more views on another show or a potential lost subscriber who can’t find anything to watch, right?

      And, with all due respect, there’s no way cartoons are more expensive-per-view than other shows.

      • Omega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ideally they would subscribe and then watch a different service. Or maybe a different cartoon is cheaper per view. Or maybe it’s a retroactive contract negotiation tactic. Basically negotiate or you won’t get any residuals.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Ideally they would subscribe and then watch a different service.

          Thats so cynical and self defeating. “They’ll use our competition and save us money.” But you’re not wrong, they could totally be thinking that rofl.

          Or maybe it’s a retroactive contract negotiation tactic. Basically negotiate or you won’t get any residuals.

          Very possible. I guess all that is even more behind-the-curtain than cable, as when shows disappear there is no reason given, no “protest” like some channels will do.

          I feel like streaming has made all this stuff even more opaque.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s too bad they couldn’t pay a certain amount in one lump sum to produce a limited number of, say, small physical discs that play video for people to buy more often.