“Fidelity is currently valuing X at about $9.4 billion”

I found this funny.

      • Robaque@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Absolutely! He simply has a very original take on “freedom”, but we all know that’s a tricky word to pin down, so don’t think about it too much, and leave it to the big dogs to tell you when your freedom is being protected.

  • tektite@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I used to enjoy how they always use dumb photos of Leon in these articles. Now I just hate seeing his face.

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    My first thought is ‘I can’t wait for it to turn zero’ but then I realize that 79% decline from 44 billion still means it is worth 9.24 billion.

    And that is still a shitload of money.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    its worth comes from being able to influence world politics. Does he seem like someone who cares or needs money?

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      The natural language dataset is worth a lot. That’s why they’re and Reddit made the sites harder to use/scrape.

    • vvvvv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Twitter currently has $1.5 billion/year deficit which is a lot, even for Musk, to bankroll.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      True, but that power is also diminished greatly as more and more regular users abandon the site. No eyes on the propaganda makes it worth a lot less.

      • kobra@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah I’m sure I’m not the norm but I’m actually shocked when I see companies advertising their/their talent’s twitter accounts on tv broadcasts. I truly can’t believe that site is still mainstream after everything that’s happened.

        Idk then I look over and see trump as a presidential candidate and ugh… I guess I’m just still not comfortable/accepting of how far off the rails things have gone 🙁

    • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      He is a net loss for humanity is the currency is moralistic.

      We be deep in the red between Trump, Bezos, this clown and many other “captains of industry”.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t have the whole context so I might be missing some things, but the whole thing looks to me like “look at how much money I have to burn and how much I don’t care”.

    • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      He didn’t even want to buy Twitter, just manipulate the stock price by talking about buying it. Dumbass signed too much paperwork and waived too many rights, though, and found himself obligated to buy it anyway. Pretty sure he tried to fight it and lost.

      So now he’s trying to not burn all his money, but he’s fucking terrible at it, so he’s just becoming a laughing stock.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    And may it continue to crash and burn. It’s just 4 chan at this point.

    • merari42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      4chan at least had a consistent brand of being the anti-social network and being full of Nazis, weirdos, pedophiles and people who are just anti-social for the lulz. You couldn’t ruin 4chan.

      Twitter’s image was being the “internet town-square for serious thinkers” with politicians, scientists, journalists and a small but good measure of standard shitposters. Loosing that brand diminishes it’s value massively. Unfortunately neither Bluesky nor Mastodon was able to catch that clientele yet.

    • kusari@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s like 4chan but it didn’t know where the line was for the amount of right wing people to be on a social media and ran a marathon

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    We knew this was going to happen before he made the purchase.

    Everyone said, the best way for Elon to keep his money was to change very little, or even take a hands-off approach.

    Masnick suggested this would happen

    It was that and so much worse. Moral of the story: Running a huge social media service is hard. Maybe don’t assume that because you’re a billionaire you’re the best at doing stuff.

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      “Maybe don’t assume that because you’re a billionaire you’re the best at doing stuff.”

      This is literally every second generation billionaire. They seem to have the tendency to believe that their success is solely due to their intelligence and not due to their parents connections and money.

    • Gloomy@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Masnick gives 20 levels of development. Elon stopped here:

      Level Two: “We’re the free speech platform! But no CSAM!”

      And that’s about it. Ex-Twitter has copyright infringement, hate speech and doesn’t give a fuck about local laws unless the law actually has teeth (Brasil, anybody?).

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I mean the people at Twitter were very happy to sell it off. Remember how they actually sued to force him to go through with the deal and succeeded in stopping him from backing out?

      Even if he’d managed it as well as the prior stewards, it was always a losing business.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        If the price offered is actually a good price then I think they might have some obligation to shareholders to pursue it. (Many of the people making that decision likely also being shareholders.) Like if someone offered you more than what your stuff is worth but tried to changed their mind, wouldn’t you pursue that? I don’t think that’s any sort of indicator that they thought it was a sinking ship. It’s just in their best interest to take a good deal when they get one.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think you make a good point. But we don’t have to guess whether they thought Twitter was struggling. We know it was.

          Twitter never managed to develop an online ad business that matched the scale of its influence in popular culture and society at large. Twitter has lost money in six of the eight years since its IPO.

          Source: CNBC

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            My point is that if someone offers you a good price for what you believe you have have, you take it. If they thought it was good and they got a good price for it they’d take it. If they thought it was bad and they got a good price for it they’d take it.

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Masnick’s post is well put, but also a disturbing reminder of how much power nation-states can exert over the Internet.

    • mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Meanwhile he is on track to become the world’s first trillionaire

      I think the purchase was more about welding power than any financial gain

      • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Now, call me crazy, but if I was optimizing for maximum welding power, I’d start with oxy acetylene and at least try a few other options. How would buying a website even be a good start?

        No wonder people are making fun of him!

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Hasn’t his wealth kinda flatlined lately though? X is doing terribly, Tesla is struggling a bit, I think SpaceX is at least doing well.

        I don’t think he’s going to be a trillionaire any time soon.

      • Pilgrim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Would you not agree that he has a tool of influence with X? I see that as the main aspect of why you’d still buy twitter, even though he knew he wouldn’t earn money with that.

      • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        He tried to back out, I don’t think any of this was about anything. He’s just a dick with a weird sense of humor.

      • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Twitter wasn’t profitable right? So most of the “value” is in the name of the product. Elon changed the name and added his signature to everything the platform was doing, completely changing the platform Twitter is. So yeah, I do get why 75% of the money is gone now.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Changing the name of one of the most valuable brands isn’t something I’d expect even him to do.