An artist who infamously duped an art contest with an AI image is suing the U.S. Copyright Office over its refusal to register the image’s copyright.

In the lawsuit, Jason M. Allen asks a Colorado federal court to reverse the Copyright Office’s decision on his artwork Theatre D’opera Spatialbecause it was an expression of his creativity.

Reuters says the Copyright Office refused to comment on the case while Allen in a statement complains that the office’s decision “put me in a terrible position, with no recourse against others who are blatantly and repeatedly stealing my work.”

  • Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Congratulations! You’re now a journalist for having typed that paragraph. Man, you’re really racking up the careers here!

    (Do you see the point here? Using a tool that does all the work for you, doesn’t make you comparable to those that spent their lives doing it without cheating. Just like typing something out using auto-correct doesn’t make you a journalist).

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Farmers aren’t really farmers, the machine does most of the work. People who work in manufacturing aren’t doing a real job, the assembly line does most of the work. Etc etc.

      So far all you’ve proven is that you’re an asshole who takes things too far.

      • Soup@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Man. If coming up with apples to oranges comparisons was a skill, somehow I have a feeling you’d have AI do it for you.

        Do you honestly think a farmer’s knowledge of crops, seasonal growth rates, harvesting times and techniques, using the right tools to promote growth, nitrogen/PH content of soil, and how to properly avoid blight is somehow the same thing as some kid knuckling a few adjectives into a computer and creating a pretty picture?

        Fuck man. You are ALL the way out of gas here.

        However, I’ll add that having punched up that ridiculous response, you’re now a world class comedian. Congrats!

        Oh, and if they work on an assembly line, then no, they’re not a manufacturer- they’re what’s called a “laborer”. That’s how shit works. The company in your scenario would be the manufacturer. They would have done the R&D, designed and financed the machinery and produced the product.

        Man, your school sucked.

        • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Do you honestly think a farmer’s knowledge of crops, seasonal growth rates, harvesting times and techniques, using the right tools to promote growth, nitrogen/PH content of soil, and how to properly avoid blight is somehow the same thing as some kid knuckling a few adjectives into a computer and creating a pretty picture?

          That’s all knowledge you need to produce crops and not fuck it up. By saying you can’t “fuck up” AI art you’re saying that the years of art school learning about composition and all other stuff is worthless because a talentless pleb like me has the same aristic vision as someone who spent their life studying art. Way to take a huge shit on all the artists.

          • Soup@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It takes zero art school knowledge to create art using AI. So no, despite your best efforts to villainize me and twist the argument in your favor…

            What I’m doing is taking a huge shit on people who pretend to be artists by using AI. Actual artists won’t need to use AI because they have actual skill.

            Same with music. If you’re too fucking lazy to pick up a guitar and play- you’re not a musician.

            • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              It takes zero art school knowledge to create art using AI.

              But it takes knowledge of art to know when a good image is generated vs any random image. The same way it takes knowledge of how to fertilize the soil, but it takes almost no farming knowledge to hop on a tractor and till the soil.

              What I’m doing is taking a huge shit on people who pretend to be artists by using AI. Actual artists won’t need to use AI because they have actual skill.

              Same with music. If you’re too fucking lazy to pick up a guitar and play- you’re not a musician.

              No, you’re clearly taking a shit on all the artist, especially after that last point about music. You pretty much said some of the greatest and most influential artists in the last 50 years are not actually artists.

              • Soup@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                You pretty much said some of the greatest and most influential artists in the last 50 years are not actually artists.

                No, I didn’t say that at all- oooohhh… wait, hold on… . Before this gets out-of-hand:

                You think that because I specifically said “guitar” that I meant to say that if it’s not written on a guitar, it’s not music. Yeah. No. It’s implied that by “guitar” I meant ANY instrument of choice that isn’t someone hitting the spacebar to start the digital track that their AI computer created for them.

                Give it a rest man. You’re not an artist in my mind. But don’t worry! I’m sure you have a lot of other people fooled. Why should one person that called you out matter?

                Go have fun somewhere.

                • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  I love how you strawman your own argument to pivot your point when you get called out. No I didn’t consider only guitar, but I did the cut off point at electronic instruments like synthesizers, sequencers, samplers etc. because they often end up “hitting the spacebar to start the digital track”. But you tell me, do you consider this music? because Aphex Twin was the first artist that came to my mind when you said what you said and he’s pretty influential.

                  Give it a rest man. You’re not an artist in my mind.

                  I love how you think I’m defending myself here. I’m not an artist in my mind either, in fact I don’t even do art. But unlike you I have enough respect for art to know that even if I personally don’t enjoy something it doesn’t stop it from being art.