• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    A better analogy is search engines. It’s just another tool, but

    • at their best enable your I to find anything from all the worlds knowledge
    • at their worst, are just another way to serve ads and scams, random companies vying for attention, they making any attention is good attention, regardless of what you’re looking for

    When I started as a software engineer, my detailed knowledge was most important and my best tool was the manuals. Now my most important tools are search engines and autocomplete: I can work faster with less knowledge of the syntax and my value is the higher level thought about what we need to do. If my company ever allows AI, I fully expect it to be as important a tool as a search engine.

    • exanime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Now my most important tools are search engines and autocomplete: I can work faster with less knowledge of the syntax and my value is the higher level thought about what we need to do. If my company ever allows AI, I fully expect it to be as important a tool as a search engine.

      And this is when the cost calculation comes into play. Using a search engine is basically free, using OpenAI for development is tied up with licenses and new hardware.

      So the question will be, are you going to improve efficiency to the point where the cost of the license and new hardware is worth the additional efficiency?

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Currently my company is more concerned with intellectual privacy, security, liability. Of course that means they’ll only allow ai where they can pay for guarantees, and that brings us back to the cost.