let’s assume you’re correct. there’s still irrefutable evidence that she did the actions that lead to charges to be filed against her.
wouldn’t what she did be considered terrorism then? it was an act thats purpose was to inflict fear and chaos on the community and destabilize the local government.
if she was tried as a terrorist, and I believe she should have been, she would have been looking at life in prison.
let’s assume you’re correct. there’s still irrefutable evidence that she did the actions that lead to charges to be filed against her.
wouldn’t what she did be considered terrorism then? it was an act thats purpose was to inflict fear and chaos on the community and destabilize the local government.
if she was tried as a terrorist, and I believe she should have been, she would have been looking at life in prison.
so, is she a criminal or a terrorist?