The number of people sleeping outdoors dropped to under 3,000 in January, the lowest the city has recorded in a decade, according to a federal count.

And that figure has likely dropped even lower since Mayor London Breed — a Democrat in a difficult reelection fight this November — started ramping up enforcement of anti-camping laws in August following a U.S. Supreme Court decision.

Homelessness in no way has gone away, and in fact grew 7%, to 8,300 in January, according to the same federal count.

But the problem is now notably out of the public eye, raising the question of where people have gone and whether the change marks a turning point in a crisis long associated with San Francisco.

  • Dkarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Eh. Using public well used spaces as your own personal living space is selfish and disrespectful of everyone else. You got a tent, go out and live in the woods.

    There is no reason to be in the city if you’re homeless other than access to drugs.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There is no reason to be in the city if you’re homeless other than access to drugs.

      Unless you are homeless and unemployed. Which is a thing. Especially in cities with ridiculously high rent like SF.

      You can’t really think that all the homeless people in cities are drug addicts.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        How DARE people not respect others’ right to live in hell without resources of any kind!

        Leaving them to play fortnite in ditches isn’t better than actually trying to do anything, you just think it is because then they aren’t your responsibility.

        Do you have any idea how many homeless die daily in those encampments? No clean water, no medical care, violence.

        And while 90-95% are just trying to survive, the last 5-10% are often violent, and brutalize the others.

        If you want to designate zones and have some form of law enforcement around to deal with the bad ones, great, but your argument is to put them in a big pot, with some truly violent ones, and just pretend everything is OK.

        Where is your pity? Oh, it’s not your problem, you’re blessing them with their freedom to suffer out of your sight.

    • norimee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Aren’t you a peach. I hope your username stands for Dick-karma and I hope that karma of being a dick comes back to you tenfold.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There is no reason to be in the city if you’re homeless other than access to drugs.

      And access to literally everything else, which is why most people live in cities. Drugs are also very common in rural areas because young people have nothing better to do and there’s lots of open space to manufacture them.

      I’m certainly not a fan of people pitching tents on sidewalks, but let’s at least stick to legitimate arguments.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I hope you never become homeless.

      Or maybe I hope you do, just enough so that you can understand what those people are going through.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Or doctors. Or jobs. Or grocery stores.

      You’d be surprised how many homeless or car bound are employed.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Using public well used spaces as your own personal living space is selfish and disrespectful of everyone else.

      Tell that to every person parking their car in public. It’s an insane waste of space and massive subsidy to the already privileged. We give free/cheap rent to cars EVERYWHERE but far far less for actual humans.

      If we ban cars, we would probably double the amount of land available housing. Not to mention the benefits in terms of imperialism, pollution, violence, equity, wastefulness, etc.

    • puppy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Eh. Using public well used spaces as your own personal living space is selfish and disrespectful of everyone else.

      Hopefully you support a ban on private vehicles then? Special big trucks and SUVs.