• TheFonz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wrong. Her answer is ‘yes’ followed by a million qualifiers. Because for sugar daddy Putin we need to use the softest padded gloves. We’re not stupid. The ruse is up.

    • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What kind of mental gymnastics do you have to be doing to claim that saying “Yes” to the question “is Putin a war criminal” isn’t a clear yes/no answer and clear agreement? This is like MAGA level insanity.

      • TheFonz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Why can’t it be yes, full stop? The same way she did for Biden and Netanyahu?

        Saying yes with no many qualifiers is insane level of weaseling.

        Heres a simple example:

        “did you rape that woman” “yes”

        vs

        “yes she was asking for it”

        Is not the same. That’s what she’s doing.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Either way it’s still a yes. Qualifiers don’t affect the result either in this case nor in your example.