return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoUS can’t ban TikTok for security reasons while ignoring Temu, other apps, TikTok arguesarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square142fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkUS can’t ban TikTok for security reasons while ignoring Temu, other apps, TikTok arguesarstechnica.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square142fedilink
minus-squareBlackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoGDPR is a start, but we need to actually ban it, not just annoy people until they click Accept at the 20th popup of that tantalising offer to share your details with 1473 trusted data partners.
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 hours agoYou can just click deny instead. The law says the site must make it easy to do so.
minus-squareBlackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 hours agoThere’s a bunch of newspapers already with the option between pay for privacy plus or accept tracking. Fortunately there’s a third option which is leave the site and never come back. Plus most of the sites will ask you again after a period of time. Until you say yes. After that they can strangely remember your choice.
GDPR is a start, but we need to actually ban it, not just annoy people until they click Accept at the 20th popup of that tantalising offer to share your details with 1473 trusted data partners.
You can just click deny instead. The law says the site must make it easy to do so.
There’s a bunch of newspapers already with the option between pay for privacy plus or accept tracking.
Fortunately there’s a third option which is leave the site and never come back.
Plus most of the sites will ask you again after a period of time. Until you say yes. After that they can strangely remember your choice.