Fear Mongering About Range Anxiety Has To Stop — CT Governor Calls Out EV Opponents::Several state governors are fighting fear mongering as they attempt to reduce transportation emissions in their states.

  • UID_Zero@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I was among those worrying about range until I spent 5 minutes thinking about what I actually do on a daily/weekly/monthly basis.

    We’d still have my wife’s ICE van, we both work from home, and 99% of the time my work-related travel is local (within 5 miles). My wife’s van can pull the camper for our camping trips, or for our longer drives.

    I have no good reason not to get an EV for my next car.

    • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I would actually consider if you actually need 2 cars at all given your description of the situation. If we’re worried about the environment flat getting rid of a car is a bigger win than an EV.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        If a car sits in the driveway 99% of the year, it’s not hurting the environment for 99% of its existence. If they continue to use it as a daily driver, I agree with you. But keeping a second vehicle for situations where it is specifically suited isn’t really that big a problem.

        • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Well, it’s the build cost for a new car vs not building that car in terms of the environment. I guess buying a used car would alleviate that, but at some point having another car built is worse than not having it built.

        • anguo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not driving a car for long periods of time is bad for the car. That means that they would replace it after a few years, and still have two cars, instead of keeping just the one. It takes a lot of resources to build a car, even more so for EVs.

      • UID_Zero@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve very seriously considered that. Right now, we could probably go down to one car without issue. We have two reasons why I’d like to maintain a second, though. We have young kids, and we are already starting to run them around to different places at the same time. We’re looking to move soon, and the idea is to move outside of town where we have more room. That would make basically every drive longer, which would increase the likelihood of needing a second vehicle.

        Either way, an EV should be fine. Depending on cost, I might stick with a small, used ICE this time, because I don’t need much. But I’m not at that point quite yet, so maybe things will change by the time I’m ready.

        • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Because third party repairs are often unavailable or void the warranty. Cars are becoming a subscription service to dealerships.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Because third party repairs are often unavailable or void the warranty

            1. No they don’t. Cars have long since had regulations allowing for third party repairs.

            2. Why would you take to a third party if you’re under warranty?

            Cars are becoming a subscription service to dealerships.

            1. What kind of subscription allows you to repair the car?

            2. This is not exclusive to EVs.

        • cryostars@lemmyf.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Because they are relatively new in the automotive world. I can take my '08 CRV to just about any auto parts store in America and get just about any part I need (or take it to about any third party repair shop with the same results). Good luck doing that with most EVs especially Teslas. Tesla is the most egregious example as they are anti right to repair and have seemed to take a page out of Apple’s book as far as locking down their supply chain for parts.

          Hopefully this will get better with time as third party shops have time to acclimate themselves and their technicians to EV architecture, and EV-specific parts become more available. Though the latter I feel is highly dependent on manufacturers not trying to turn EVs into phones in terms of repairability/serviceability.

          In the meantime, as an average Joe without a lot of money, I really like the idea of keeping my relatively low cost older ICE vehicles because if shit hits the fan, if I can’t fix it relatively cheaply, there will likely be multiple shops that can without it costing me an arm and a leg and/or taking weeks or months to wait on the manufacturer to supply the parts needed.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I can take my '08 CRV to just about any auto parts store in America and get just about any part I need

            Again, why would you think EVs are different?

            Hopefully this will get better with time as third party shops have time to acclimate themselves and their technicians to EV architecture

            Third party shops are not manufacturing parts.

            If your wanna talk about Teslas, I’ll agree. If you wanna talk about “new cars” I’ll agree again. But none of this is exclusive specifically to EVs.