Wikepedia states

“Much like today’s socially acceptable terms idiot and moron, which are also defined as some sort of mental disability, when the term retard is being used in its pejorative form, it is usually not being directed at people with mental disabilities. Instead, people use the term when teasing their friends or as a general insult.”

Is it only a slur if directed at soneone with mental disabilities? Is it a slur if durected at onself?

Whats lemmies take on this?

  • norimee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It is always a slur, even directed to someone mentally healthy, because it reinforces ableist and hateful stereotypes.

    The same way calling men and boys female slurs like bitch or pussy is mysogonistic and puts women down.

    You don’t call a person a “retard” in a complimentary way. You compare them to a mentally disabled person to convey how dumb or stupid they are. Putting other people down at the same time.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Yes, it’s a slur. Especially outside of the US (where mental conditions are less overtly stigmatised).

    Supposedly it’s being “reclaimed” by the alt-right on Twitter. But obvously don’t listen to the alt-right’s views on social progressiveness.

    Also, don’t call yourself “retarded”, you’re better than that. <3

    Edit: I’m in the UK, and I find this list useful to figure out what’s offensive and what isn’t: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/broadcast-standards/offensive-language

    • I'm back on my BS 🤪@lemmy.autism.place
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Supposedly it’s being “reclaimed” by the alt-right on Twitter.

      omg I would love to see some examples! is it like when they claimed that, “We are all domestic terrorists”? I would pee my g-string if I saw that they seriously said, “We are all re******” 😆

  • vinnymac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Slurs should not be excusable when directed at oneself.

    For example, if you were to say “I am a retard” in front of someone with a disability, who may have been labeled as such throughout their life, how do you imagine they would feel about that?

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Disagreed. As a certified lifelong retard with the papers to back it up medically, I will never relinquish my right to refer to myself however I want. If someone else takes offense, it’s 100% on them.

      Remember, offense is always taken, never given.

      • eatthecake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Remember, offense is always taken, never given.

        If you believe this idiot semantic nonsense then you really are a retard.

      • tomi000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Exactly. Responsibility always lies with the recipient, you cant blame me for punching your face, its your pain. I didnt rape you, you got yourself raped.

        • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Lol equating words with physical actions. Guess us retards are in good company here. Have a seat.

          • greencactus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            While you may have the right to call yourself what you want, you shouldn’t use it in an “us” context. At least I wouldn’t be okay with it.

  • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Let’s go through examples:

    “He’s retarded” - that’s a slur, unless it’s ironic.

    “That was retarded” - not a slur, cause it’s kinda taking a dig at an action, not a person.

    “I’m retarded” - technically a slur but almost always used with a hint of irony, therefore usually not a slur.

    That’s how I use the word with my friends. And I have autism, so technically 100 years ago I would have been the resident retard ;)

    • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Utterly incorrect. Irony does not affect whether a thing is a slur or not. It doesn’t matter what you use the slur towards, it remains a slur. Any excuse you use to explain why you can use a slur is exactly that: an excuse.

      • Womble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Youre right that irony doesnt stopbit being a slur, but usage absolutely matters. Unless you think its inexcusable black people using the n word with each other? Context is incredibly important.

        • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Just to make it clear, I am white, so take my opinion on this with a grain of salt.

          From what I understand, there isn’t a universal consensus among black communities that the n-word is okay between black people. Some people get just as offended no matter who says it.

          Of course, some people are perfectly fine with it, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t a slur. It’s still a slur, it’s just not offending anyone at that moment. It’s like an empty gun: it won’t harm anyone, but it’s still a gun.

          • Womble@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Any excuse you use to explain why you can use a slur is exactly that: an excuse.

            I guess that is what I take issue with, that statement makes it sounds like any use of a slur is always wrong regardless of context and that any reason for using it is just to wiggle out of you being a bad person.

            • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              I mean, it might be a good excuse. Doesn’t change the slur.

              In Blazing Saddles, the actors playing the racists apologised to their co-stars after every take. They had a damn good excuse to say what they said, but they still apologised for saying it.

    • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      What’s wrong with someone having cognitive difficulties? Why do you feel the need to use the word as a descriptor for negative things?

      • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        • nothing. I have autism. There’s nothing wrong with me, but I’m obviously a little bit different like other people, which in itself is neither good nor bad.

        • because we need a descriptor and that’s just what my friends use; we know what we mean with it and what we don’t.

        Also I’m gonna take those questions at face value, but I’m just gonna note the first question is a bit out out of left field, as no one implied that something’s wrong with that.

        But I don’t wanna assume you are an asshole, so I’m gonna take it as a misunderstanding.

        • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          The way I usually see it playing out is that people usually call things are negative “reatarded” (e.g. “This app is retarded!”, “Wow, I thought that tomato was a fruit, lmao I’m still retarded!”). It just pushes the negative stereotypes associated with it. I don’t know if that’s what you are doing, but that’s how I see a lot of “stop being sensitive bros” do it.

          I know its easy to say that every one who hears you talk fully understands precisely what you mean, but do they? I’ve seen stories of people who “ironically” use racial slurs and didn’t realise that it resulted in most of their friends turning out to be actual racists. Likewise, are you pushing away would-be friends who don’t want to associate with people who casually throw out slurs? That’s ignoring the impact of saying it in a public place, where victims of abuse can hear it.

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Dictionary definition for a slur is: an insulting or disparaging remark or innuendo

    Calling someone a retard definitely aint a compliment and even when used jokingly among friends, the meaning of the word itself still remains the same. I think everyone agrees that the n-word is a slur too despite black people calling eachother that without the intention to offend and no offence being taken. By this definition, I’d say retard counts as a slur too.

    However, if someone takes issue with the word retard but doesn’t mind the use of words moron, idiot or imbecille, then they’re just being a hypocrite.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m autistic and both me and my autistic friends call ourselves retarded all the time lol. I’d rather be called that than “neurodiverse” or whatever the euphemism treadmill has come up with.

    (As an aside, it’s also an engineering term, for it’s original meaning, slow down)

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It means you are not afraid. Because most people are really worried about someone telling them that they are being racist, insulting, or whatever they come up with. The definition of being these things is up to the person, not you. So you are a racist if you are being called a racist by someone, appearently. :)

      Maybe you can tell that im mostly laughing at the politically correct movement of today… :)

    • rustyfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      You have to differentiate. Calling your friends stuff is one thing, doing so to others is something different. It still is a slur, no matter what it has been years ago, and it will hurt somebody.

      But yeah, we use it too from time to time. I am autistic myself and so are most of my friends. But my preferences or my condition doesn’t give me some special right to act like a jackass to others.

      I mean, at the very least we can try.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      the engineering term is a different word with different pronunciation. It’s not even a noun.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Slurs work like a treadmill. Technical terms start being used as slurs (“moron” and “idiot” are examples) and are replaced by new, neutral words, and the cycle begins again. We’ve had a few decades of “special” being used as a euphemism for mental disability, and that word is on its way to becoming a slur (in certain contexts, it can be used unambiguously as one).

  • okwhateverdude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think “slur” also requires a component of direct offense for it mean anything. I don’t think it is valid to be offended for somebody else if that somebody else isn’t actually offended. If I make up a slur on the spot denigrating some aspect of your person that you do not find offensive (eg. Flumplenook - for a person who’s a bit clumsy), is it really a slur?

    So if you call someone retarded, and they do not have the mental faculties to be offended, is it really a slur?

    For slurs to have any meaning, any power, they need to be understood and internalized as offensive.

  • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Many people who would be labelled “retarded” (as in, people with learning disabilities presenting external physical symptoms like Down’s Syndrome) find the term offensive and say it is a slur. It doesn’t matter what anyone else thinks, because they are not affected in the same way. It is a slur.

  • lulztard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Everything is a slur. It’s not about the word, it’s about intention and usage. Everyone who is fine with idiot but gets karen-y at retard does not care about people of reduced intelligence but only about oppressing those around him and making himself feel superior.

  • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    The WOKE liberal mob will have to PRY the word from my COLD RETARDED HANDS because I will never stop saying it

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    As someone on the autism spectrum, I don’t mind using it or hearing people use it at all, as long as it’s being used as a synonym for “dumb” and not being used to specifically disparage someone with a disability. Just like “idiot”, words evolve over time from being specific words to refer to disabilities to just general words for someone being a dumbass.

    • ABCDE@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Dumb is also to describe someone who is disabled. Like yourself, I’m ASD, and don’t really mind it, as long as it’s not being used in a nasty way.

      Idiot I didn’t realise, thanks for the education.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yes, it’s explicitly made to compare to people with developmental disorders who are even to this day bullied with this word. Don’t use it.

      • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Can you imagine walking up to a stranger in a wheel chair and saying something like; “Hey cripple, your legs don’t work?”

        Is cripple a slur? Not really (imo) but you dehumanise someone with words and reduce them to only be their affliction. Eliminating everything about them that might be special and individual.

      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        They’re not properly referred to by that word. They USED to be referred to by that word back when they (falsely) believed that such disorders made them inferior.

        Classifying those who were mentally less-developed as “retarded” became the excuse for a world that would try all types of monstrous experiments, ostensibly in an attempt to “heal them” because this was they only way “those people” could be a use to society; as lab rats for things like lobotomies, electro-shock therapy and any other wacky insanity that the early 20th century had dreamed up.

        In effect, while “retarded” was once the so-called medical terminology it very quickly became shorthand for an entire group of people that could be dismissed and used because they’d serve no other purpose otherwise.

        • bastion@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Mental retardation is no excuse for abuse. But it’s still an apt term, in denotation. But the connotation has become unacceptable.

          A plant’s growth may be retarded due to various conditions, and that may interfere with it’s prospects for survival.

          Fire retardant may prevent a fire from starting, or stop one that has started to develop.

          But when considering people, there are a whole slew of subtle problems, including that people may include that in their identity, and give up. They can be treated, possibly, but that’s all for them now. You’re a retard. It leaves no room for other things. People still feel this way about some diagnoses that, if they didn’t lean into them so hard, leave plenty of room for change. But the social weight behind “retard” just carries too much crap, and speaks volumes - some of which may be true, but a lot of which is not.

          ‘Disabled’, ‘undeveloped’, and ‘inhibited’ can be good terms. But most of it depends more heavily on how we treat others and what has been taken into common use.