• earmuff@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well, who is using mysql/mariadb nowadays anyways? If you haven’t made the switch to at least postgres in the past 5 years, you messed up anyways.

  • rhabarba@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I hope this won’t have any negative effects on PostgreSQL which will hopefully not have to cater the MySQL refugees now.

      • rhabarba@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        MySQL refugees = those who ran to MariaDB when MySQL was bought by 'Orrible and now need another new home. Accidentally, PostgreSQL has grown support for some of MySQL on recent versions.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oracle is such a terrible company for their customers it makes a ton of sense to try to get them to switch to a less abusive company

          • rhabarba@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Some of our customers rely on Oracle’s database system, because history. Sadly, we can’t teach them.

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              True, and I keep those folks in my prayers.

              But if you’re on MySQL it’s a lot less of a lift to switch to MariaDB than it is to go to Postgres, even if Postgres is better in some ways.

              • rhabarba@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I rewrote the last remaining MySQL-based software of mine this year because I didn’t want to have MariaDB just for this one tool. Everything else had already been migrated. PostgreSQL is much faster in my tests.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            My coworker used to work with Oracle at his last job, and he took an architect position at my company near the start of development. There’s a reason we use Postgres at our org…

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’ve never heard of K1.

    Should we expect MariaDB enshittification to ensure?

    Strategic investment aims to accelerate MariaDB’s mission to deliver innovative, scalable database solutions with new executive leadership to drive the next phase of growth

    I’m not reading that as a “no” :(

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      MariaDB is actually two separate entities: The company MariaDB and the MariaDB organization. The company sells enterprise licenses and support, and the organization manages the actual development. So there’s a little separation that will at least slow the enshittification.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ah, good to know.

        I did know there were two sides of it (we explored MariaDB Enterprise at work, but unfortunately it didn’t pan out).

        Any more, I just assume one company buying any other always results in a worse experience post-sale.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          MariaDB tried to go public a while back and their stock price tanked immediately and never recovered. If they hadn’t gotten acquired I imagine they’d have gone out of business.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      How the fuck do you “accelerate” something they are already achieving?

      Not sure how much of a future it can have even if you slap on some “speed”.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There were so many web apps written in the early 00s on the LAMP stack, including Facebook. And that’s not counting the tiny internal applications that so many businesses have that use MySQL/MariaDB. Because these are business critical applications, they pay Oracle/MariaDB for support.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Good news in furthering Postgres adoption I guess. I mean most stuff was going that way anyway, but this will likely speed things up.

  • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hummm… Can someone tell me if this is good news or bad news?

    Generally a buy-out is mostly bad news, but I can’t tell here in this specific case.