Donald Trump has quietly wound down his presidential campaign in states he was targeting just six weeks ago amid polling evidence showing that Kamala Harris’s entry into the presidential race has put them out of reach and narrowed his path to the White House.

The Republican presidential nominee’s campaign has diverted resources away from Minnesota, Virginia and New Hampshire – states Trump was boasting he could win while Joe Biden was the Democratic candidate – to focus instead on a small number of battleground states.

Money is being poured into the three “blue wall” states of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, which were all carried by Biden in 2020 and are seen as vital to the outcome of November’s election.

MBFC
Archive

  • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I love that 94% of the states and like 99% of the population doesn’t matter when electing the president. Is this a sign of a healthy democracy?

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I mean, if you’re going to use that metric, you might as well go smaller, because a lot of people in those states have already made up their mind. It’s only voters who might be willing to choose or adjust their vote that are in play.

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s like saying the first 94 meters of a 100 meter race don’t matter because the last 6 meters decide the winner. If you don’t finish the last 6 meters ahead, you’ve lost.

      • makyo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s not exactly the best comparison though because you have to run all 100 meters in the foot race, but in the presidential race you basically don’t have to run at all in the majority of states.

      • jumjummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That analogy doesn’t work because in these models it’s a straight tie for those 94 meters and it’s the last 6 meters that are left. If the polling data is accurate (big if of course), then the other 47 states cancel each other out in EC votes, so it’s down to these 3.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s being decided by all the states. Swing states are simply the ones that pollsters can’t accurately predict.

    • confused_code_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Those 3 states are huge, but the other swing states are definitely still a factor. If Harris wins all 3 Blue Wall states, she very likely will win the presidency. However, if she doesn’t win all 3, then either candidate’s victory will likely be decided by the other swing states - Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina, and Georgia.

    • Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well, on average each state has 2% of the population. So, you could say any state with more than 6m people represents an above average population