• HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    One party represents just what is good for them and theirs with no consideration for long term function and stability of the country. The other represents just what is good for them and theirs but realize they need the country to consider relatively stably for their own long term good.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Eh, I see it this way:

      • Republicans - desperate to hold on to relevance, so they’re going for short-term wins
      • Democrats - desperate to appeal to younger generations, and promoting the wants and needs of minorities seems to be working

      I don’t see either as caring too much for longer term stability. Democrats want to raise/eliminate the debt limit (i.e. more social programs), and Republicans want to use the debt limit for political concessions (i.e. appeal to base with lip-service to fiscal responsibility), neither seems particularly worried about balancing the budget.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        democrats would allow taxes to be collected to not borrow much. Republicans would get rid of any taxes that are not straight out fee for service. Debt arises from not paying bills.

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        What makes you think the democracts have any interest in the “younger generation?” The average age of democrat leadership is OLDER then republicans. Voter turn out among the younger generation is also abysmal because the dem do not appeal to the younger generation at all.