This is a follow-up from my previous thread.
The thread discussed the question of why people tend to choose proprietary microblogging platfroms (i.e. Bluesky or Threads) over the free and open source microblogging platform, Mastodon.
The reasons, summarised by @noodlejetski@lemm.ee are:
- marketing
- not having to pick the instance when registering
- people who have experienced Mastodon’s hermetic culture discouraging others from joining
- algorithms helping discover people and content to follow
- marketing
and I’m saying that as a firm Mastodon user and believer.
Now that we know why people move to proprietary microblogging platforms, we can also produce methods to counter this.
How do we get “normies” to adopt the Fediverse?
We all love bashing out less techie friends but dunking on them is counter productive!
Like it or not they make the main/lame stream. We need fedi to go mainstream to deny corpo trash profits.
Like it or not, normies must be onboarded!
but once there is a big pond with a lot of fish, there will be sharks.
Why? Who cares if we don’t have to interact with them? Becoming mainstream was the downfall of Reddit.
If you don’t forge your own destiny, then somebody will do it for you aka reddit.
Reddit failed due to governance and centralization issue. Not BC it was mainstream IMHO
You don’t think the massive amount of repetitive jokes and reposts and overall shitty attention whoring content was a problem on Reddit?
I would posit that the main/lame stream is not the actor doing that shit but rather that their presence attracts bad faith actors.
So we’re still better off without them.