• Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Brother, the owner of the business who made the ad is gay. They didn’t do this to objectify women, they did it to raise awareness about the ethics of O&G. It’s not some weird misogynist douchebag drawing this up.

          • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            You don’t need to be a “misogynist douchebag” to know that putting 2 provocative women on a billboard will turn heads[1] and use that knowledge.
            If that were the case, then most cosmetic/clothing/jewellery product companies would have their figureheads, labelled as such. Of course, they are not because they are considered relevant.

            But in the end, they all have the same in common: they care about their wallets more than people in another country they don’t know.


            1. and do so, more than 2 men ↩︎

        • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Gay people can’t be misogynist? Also this isn’t about ethics, it’s about BS marketing pushing Canadian oil as more ethical than Saudi oil-- from an industry that only cares about this because… they sell Canadian oil (that I’ll add is considerably more expensive to extract and gas prices would skyrocket if Canada relied solely on domestically produced oil).

  • The Dark Lord ☑️@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    You don’t choose from where you get your oil. There’s one oil market. You can choose to ban imports of oil from certain countries (like Russia).

    The better move is just to migrate further away from oil usage altogether.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      The oil market actually has sub markets that break down by region and the type of crude that is being traded. Not all crude is created equal and there are different types of refineries that are designed to refine the different types of crude.

      For example, a refinery that refines light / sweet crude won’t take the heavy stuff. Which is why places like North America export a lot of their domestic stuff. North America has a lot refineries looking for light crude, but pulls a lot of heavy stuff out of the ground.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It doesn’t have to be an outright ban. You could have tariffs on imported oil, subsidies for domestic oil production, or loosened regulations that make domestic production less expensive. Reducing oil use is important, but so is reducing reliance on foreign oil. While the former also helps accomplish the latter, increased domestic oil production could still be beneficial.

      (I generally think that international trade is a net benefit, but there’s a lot to be said for avoiding dependence on not-so-friendly foreign governments for the supply of economic essentials.)

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Hydraulically frack deez nuts

    (Or the lesbian equivalent thereof)

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    my brother in christ those are oil sands, unless you’re leveraging the horniness of lesbians to break down and refine the sands, idk why the fuck you think that’s economically viable lmao.

  • Bonsoir@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Because Canada has the trashied oil production of the world. It’s all oil sands.
    It’s better for the environment to import petrol from the US rather than produce it “locally”.