For me, it may be that the toilet paper roll needs to have the open end away from the wall. I don’t want to reach under the roll to take a piece! That’s ludicrous!
That or my recent addiction to correcting people when they use “less” when they should use “fewer”
Beans don’t belong in chili.
Crunchy peanut butter shouldn’t exist. It’s lazy, unfinished peanut butter. At the very least, it should cost less. Why are we paying the same price for a job half finished?
envy and jealousy are supposed to have different meanings, but idiots always use jealous when they mean envious. Annoys the fuck out of me.
Games with kernel level anti-cheat.
Slackware is still an important and useful distro.
It doesn’t make any assumptions about how you want to use your computer.
Do you want a system that’s more stable than Debian or as bleeding edge as Arch?
Do you want a minimal system that runs on an old 486 or a full-featured KDE desktop?
Do you want to compile from source, download tarballs from Github, install .deb packages, .rpm packages or FlatPaks?
Are you running a web server or a laptop?
Slackware don’t care. There’s no “Debian way”, no “partial upgrades are unsupported”, no “don’t mix in other repos”, no “don’t edit this file, it will be overwritten”. Do whatever the fuck you want, it’s your PC.If it were supposed to be pronounced “jif” it would have been spelled that way, I don’t give two fucks what Stephen Wilhite said about it either.
deleted by creator
The little separator bars on the conveyor belts thingies at the cashier in a super market should always be placed for the person behind you. If the bozo in front of me wants to pay for my shit he can go right ahead.
JRPG
The medical symbol of the staff with the snake is only supposed to have 1 (one) snake on it. A staff with 1 snake is the Rod of Asclepius (the son of Apollo and Greek demigod of medicine), a staff with 2 snakes is a Caduceus which is carried by Hermes as a messenger or herald.
Physicians get 1 snake. Couriers and heralds get 2 snakes. Any medical professional or organization that uses 2 snakes is wrong and needs to go study the humanities and classics for a bit.
“white chocolate” doesn’t exist. It’s just sugar and a little bit of cocoa butter. It’s edible wax. It’s not chocolate and it doesn’t belong in any assortment of sweets, ever. Cocoa butter is skin moisturizer and that’s it.
Have you tried ruby chocolate yet? I’m guessing you won’t be impressed.
Ruby chocolate?
What is Ruby Chocolate? Everything You Need to Know
I’ve tried it a couple of times, but it’s a little hard to find.
I get it off Amazon. It’s so good as is.
It gets it’s name from it’s reddish-pink color.
@notnotmike@programming.dev, this one trigger you to?
Blocked.
It provably does exist. And it’s delicious. I could go to the supermarket and buy some right now. Except I’m fat and trying to lose weight.
You have my sword.
And my bow.
And my axe!
Oh crap, I zoned out. What are we doing?
Dunking on a dude that doesn’t think white chocolate is chocolate, hope that helps
Hey, you. You’re finally awake.
The invocation is complete.
You have summoned a Reddit! Press X to restart
Cocoa butter is delicious you fucking heathen. Its melt rate is so close to human skin that it is one of the best carriers of flavor in a cold food.
The PROBLEM is all the white chocolate you’ve had (or likely never had, from your writing) was child grade hersheys. Try something made in a shop where they add fresh vanilla or strawberry syrup and if you don’t change your mind then you just don’t like sweets.
It does exist in the way that chocolate ‘solids’ exist as an element of chocolate. A typical chocolate bar consists of both chocolate solids and cocoa butter. It’s still an element of what you’re eating,
So just cuz you eat ‘chocolate’ because you think you only favor the solids, you’re still eating the butter too in what makes chocolate. It’s like drinking milk products and then getting pedantic over people who use butter as a food even though milk contains some the same elements.
But again this is about stupid hills to die on. And you picked an intolerant and ignorant stance so I guess you technically win in this particular topic.
No need for personal attack, this is all in good fun.
I’m fine with changing the name for it, but you sir can fuck right off if you want me to stop eating it instead of your “real” chocolate
Well, since you called me “sir” like a polite person, I shall retort. I don’t care if you eat it, this is about being pedantic! You can go and eat kale!
I try to be polite when cursing at others. It just makes for better online discourse imo
TIL I like eating wax
The most delicious edible wax I’ve ever had.
I agree with your feeling for the most part. White chocolate is not chocolate and does not belong in chocolate assortments or in the lofty company of actual chocolate. It’s a byproduct of chocolate making more than a chocolate itself. That being said, candy and sweets that are made with cocoa butter can be nice. I’m just not going to eat it when I want chocolate.
I’m allergic to chocolate solids but can eat cocoa butter. So, in a society that is unreasonably obsessed with chocolate, it is nice that there is occasionally a “white chocolate” option on things that for some reason come in 15 flavors of chocolate and little else.
I would argue it’s actually congealed demon jizz but it’s definitely not fucking chocolate.
Thank you for being fun and not a terrible person.
Load the goddamn plane by column, window seats to aisle seats, grouped by odd/even seat numbers and make people line up largest seat number to smallest. It takes an extra five minutes before you board the plane and saves you twenty or thirty. It wouldn’t even cost you the five if it was the standard.
Petty hill
If you keep correcting very minor grammatical mistakes when I am speaking, such as “you mean fewer, not less”, I will just stop talking to you entirely
Technically, I wait until you’re done speaking to strike
It’s simple though. If you can count it, it’s fewer. If not, it’s less.
Fewer people. Less noise.
That isn’t a grammatic rule. Some guy one time was like “I think it sounds better that way.”
That’s all.
They’ve always been used interchangeably.
People who love to “correct” this are just showing ass to anyone who knows any better haha.
This is a way in which you can discredit any attempt at proposing correct or logical language use. Yes, language changes. Your assertions are still debatable. English is ambiguous enough as is. It’s not ‘showing ads’ to propose some form of consistent or logical usage of words. I’m happy to count that as a petty hill I’m willing to die on.
And since we’re being petty, it’s either ‘grammatical rule’, or ‘Grammar rule’.
This is a way in which you can discredit any attempt at proposing correct or logical language use
It absolutely is not. You’re just talking out of your ass.
The same one that you are, in fact, showing when you demand that the personal preference of some random stranger is the way that everyone has to talk from now on. Ludicrous.
You need some salsa for that chip on your shoulder, or is there another reason why you’re getting so personal?
Don’t answer. I don’t actually care.
Turns out language is pretty damn flexible. Even if I made an obvious mistake, you meant what I knew.
You’ve been Affected by something, not Effected, you enimal.
People say “I’m just gonna go try and do it”
No.
Say “I’m just gonna go try to do it.”
really stupid, really pointless, I’ve never corrected anyone on it, but oh, how I want to
