It’s widely disliked.

I realize that mods for individual subs on different servers need to buy-in, that it’s not just a collective vote. The aim of asking here is the hope that we can get a discussion going and do a vibes check on the community at large.

  • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I find it quite handy - it’s a bit excessive on nearly every post, but it does add context when I don’t recognise the news source, and it’s useful to see whether I really need to do some more digging on the article rather than should look for other views on a story.

    It’s frustrating to see a comment or two on a post preview pane you’re interested in though and boom, it’s a bot rather than another user to engage with.

    It would work really well as a plug in or tool, giving you inline information in the post itself.

    • ccunning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It would work really well as a plug in or tool, giving you inline information in the post itself.

      This would be amazing; along with options to select from several “bias checkers” would be nearly perfect.

      I second your frustrations, but overall I think it’s good enough for now.

  • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I would be happy to see it replaced by something better, but I don’t want it to disappear. Having any kind of reference for source reliability, even just as a reminder to think about it, helps provide perspective on political posts.

    We live in an era where it has become normal to dump masses of bullshit online in the hope that sheer volume will convince people it’s true. Pointing out the credibility gap between NPR and Fox News is important.

    • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Something can certainly be better than nothing, but the bias of the bias checker definitely skews right. It muddies the water, and serves counter to its stated purpose.

    • Womble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sure, pointing out the difference in credibility between NPR and Fox news is good. But claiming that the Guardian and the Sun are equally credible is worse than doing nothing.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Naah, it’s pretty good. Like monsier ccunning a dit, block it if you don’t like it.