• JaN0h4ck@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago
    • AI bs
    • Imitating the iPhones Design
    • Small performance improvement
    • Very expensive

    They just completely alienate their core audience. Don’t think I’ll ever go back to them

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The camera hardware is just ok. The benefits come from the built-in automatic image manipulation / improvement in the Pixel camera app. Download a generic camera app (like Open Camera or SimpleCamera before the takeover) and see the difference in pictures compared to the Pixel Camera (which, by the way, you can download from Aurora).

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      They missed out on many things too. While the Pixel Pro has an LTPO display, the base model doesn’t. They only ship with UFS 3.1 storage despite UFS 4.0 being available. Charger is still not bundled.

      Heck, give anything except for AI.(144Hz screen anyone? Motorola has them). I never used Assistant and after trying Gemini out for some time, disabled it as well.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        All else aside, what the heck do you need to waste battery power for on a 144hz phone screen? There’s no reason. Heck, I have a 120hz screen and turned it down to 60.

        • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I just meant, that having a higher powered refresh rate screen that can easily be toggled on/off is more refreshing than more on device AI, IMO.

          • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            The ai stuff you can do with pictures on the pixel 9 is actually pretty nifty. I could see using that a lot more than a high refresh rate.

            • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I have a noob question, is backporting any of these camera features possible for Google to older Pixel phones or is there a technical limitation?

              I do agree about diminishing returns on high refresh rates. I have my current phone turned to 120 Hz and it gobbles up battery quite much.

              • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                It would be possible, but it would be a lot slower and use up a lot more power. By my limited understanding, AI chips work by being able to do a lot of imprecise math at once, instead of normal chips designed to do precise math and not a lot at once.

        • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The companies stopped giving chargers so they can sell them later to customers as an extra accessory and make more money. This wouldn’t be a problem if there was a uniform standard. But USB PD isn’t used by majority of manufacturers. My 33W charger can’t charge my Samsung device fast which only draws maximum of 25W because previous is based on VOOC thing.

    • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I always used to jump models, going back all the way to the first Nexus. This’ll be the first time I don’t. Unfortunately I know the Pixel 7 I have now will have its battery life mysteriously go to shit about three months before it’s paid off.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      They’ve also always had poor quality hardware, just like Apples iPhone offerings.

      These companies use advertising to make their phones seem great, then they have severe issues (E.g. speaker issues on pixel, overheating on iPhone’s).

      It’s all garbage, and it’s bad for ya.

      • JaN0h4ck@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Tbh I went through a lot of Pixels that broke on some way:

        • 3a: fell on the floor, screen dead
        • 4XL Battery bloated and blew out the back glass
        • 5 fell on the floor, screen dead
        • 5 (replacement) usb port stopped working

        The Pixel 6 is the first one that held up long term, but my next phone will probably be a fairphone

      • Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The pixel 7 pro is the first phone that im happy with after dozens of Samsung, Redmi, Xiaomi, HTC, Sony garbage phones. Especially Samsung is trash.

        The last good phone before that was my Motorola Droid.

        I’m almost done with smartphones and most of the internet anyway. It’s all corporate owned bullshit.

        • mememuseum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I just upgraded to a Pixel 7 Pro recently. Previously I had a Galaxy S8 that worked fine for about 7 years. It was really just showing its age. It still holds a charge halfway decently.

          Might try installing GrapheneOS on it at some point.

          It feels fairly high quality though and I’m hoping I’ll be able to get 7 years out of it like the Galaxy.