• Wotan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I am afraid there is nothing like minimalism when we talk about mobile phones. It is basically all or nothing. I mean, it seems like everybody only thinks about social media apps but I don’t care about social media, I want my phone to run apps that control my smart home appliances, contain my public transport tickets, my ID card, my air tickets and other such convenient stuff. Most of these apps basically only exist for iOS or Android and some of them only work when downloaded from the official stores. So any phone achieving minimalism by using custom OS is just unusable for me and is equal to a dumb phone.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I don’t really see the issue. Minimalism is a sliding scale.

    Just because the design goal was for it to be more minimalist than a typical Android/iOS phone doesn’t mean they have to go full-on “NO. It’s only for phonecalls and maybe SMS!”

    Playing music isn’t particularly “maximalist”, and WhatsApp certainly isn’t (people in the US need to understand that WhatsApp is basically SMS for most of the world). Maybe maps is, but it’s optional anyway so who cares.

    This device looks very cool to me. But there’s no way it won’t cost an absolute fortune, which kills it IMO.

    • KuroiKaze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Even in USA nobody ever SMS me. Messenger and insta are primary with WhatsApp and signal sometimes being relevant and wechat for the Chinese community.

      • nexas_XIII@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Crazy, most people use SMS with Messenger as the go to for big groups for me (in USA). No one I know uses WhatsApp

          • nexas_XIII@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m just giving anecdotal evidence, just like you gave 🤷‍♂️ I’m not promoting one way of communicating vs another.

          • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Unencrypted is not the thing that bothers me - after all, Telegram is so popular, so not like most people even care. What bothers me is that you still need to pay for each one! You have to edit the texts to fit into a tiny arbitrary character restriction or else you’s be charged for a second message! Why is data do relatively cheap, but those messages are still overpriced?

            • wingsfortheirsmiles@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Mobile plans as standard here (in the UK) offer SMS for free, can’t remember when they used to routinely charge tbh. But I think I only text my dad as he’s very old school, everyone else is Signal/WhatsApp/Telegram

            • KuroiKaze@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Huh I haven’t met anyone on telegram yet. Agreed if you somehow didn’t have infinite SMS in your plan you are taking an L

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Minimalism and smartphone don’t belong in the same sentence. Sorry! Just make a 1990s style dumbphone with physical buttons and a removable battery before you talk about minimalism, please.