No. You asked a deliberatly transphobic question, to define a REAL women (implying some women are not real). Then banned me because I refused to fall for your trick.
It is impossible to objectively mod your own arguments. You are Judge Judy and executioner.
This would be a lot more believable if you didn’t make a post earlier today suggesting Biden is a pedophile and didn’t have a bunch of deleted antivaxxer posts in the modlogs (and one suggesting the live broadcast of the moon landing was fake).
All the other examples listed are highlight faulty logic, not expressing an opinion.
Saying A does not imply B.
In our particular case, saying a governing body should clarifying it’s classification rules to avoid future incidents does not imply hate towards any particular person or group of people.
You are being overly antagonistic and seem unreasonably attached to labeling me as right wing.
You post too often and inaccurately for conversations like this not to occur again. I’ve already corrected your posts twice today and further interactions could be mistaken for a grudge.
I don’t like blocking people because I’m here to hear a variety of opinions, but it’s probably better for everyone if I do so.
As a parting thought, I’ll leave you with the definition of a bigot and let you reflect.
A person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction, especially one who is prejudiced against or antagonistic towards a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group.
I definitely let the moderator power go to my head by banning people for being bigots in the communities I moderate what with that being against the rules in those communities.
I mean really, the temerity- the gall of me enforcing rules just because I’m a moderator.
You were banned from World News because of transphobic bigotry, as you know.
No. You asked a deliberatly transphobic question, to define a REAL women (implying some women are not real). Then banned me because I refused to fall for your trick.
It is impossible to objectively mod your own arguments. You are Judge Judy and executioner.
This would be a lot more believable if you didn’t make a post earlier today suggesting Biden is a pedophile and didn’t have a bunch of deleted antivaxxer posts in the modlogs (and one suggesting the live broadcast of the moon landing was fake).
Whoops.
I thought the charge was being transphobic?
All the other examples listed are highlight faulty logic, not expressing an opinion.
Saying A does not imply B.
In our particular case, saying a governing body should clarifying it’s classification rules to avoid future incidents does not imply hate towards any particular person or group of people.
Sorry, not going to argue with you about this right-wing shit again. Go find someone else to be bigoted around.
You are being overly antagonistic and seem unreasonably attached to labeling me as right wing.
You post too often and inaccurately for conversations like this not to occur again. I’ve already corrected your posts twice today and further interactions could be mistaken for a grudge.
I don’t like blocking people because I’m here to hear a variety of opinions, but it’s probably better for everyone if I do so.
As a parting thought, I’ll leave you with the definition of a bigot and let you reflect.
Yep. Sounds like you.
you really do let the moderator power go to you head huh
I definitely let the moderator power go to my head by banning people for being bigots in the communities I moderate what with that being against the rules in those communities.
I mean really, the temerity- the gall of me enforcing rules just because I’m a moderator.