• Lemmeenym@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s crucial to note that our bias scale is calibrated to the political >spectrum of the United States, which may not align with the >political landscapes of other nations.

    From their methodology page.

    They aren’t rating for any and all bias. They are rating for political bias within the context of the US political landscape.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Which makes it even more absurd considering some of their other ratings. They rate The Washington Post as leftist. The Washington Post. The newspaper for respectable Republicans owned by the platonic ideal of a capitalist. The newspaper every movie and television show in the nation uses to show what the Republicans think about something while they use the New York Times to show what the Democrats think about something. When they say they’re telling you the US political landscape they’re just lying. It’s a garbage bot using a garbage source.

      That’s not even to speak of all the other terrible problems with this source that have been documented by others elsewhere which I encourage you to read.

      • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        the newspaper for respectable republicans

        I agree with a lot your critique of WaPo but it is not favored by republicans at all. Centrist/center-left democrats 100%

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah, if I wanted a paper as a capitalist/conservative symbol, I’d use the WSJ.

          Anyway, MBFC is garbage and this bot is actively harmful.