The brazen appearance of white supremacist groups in Nashville left the city grappling with how to confront hateful speech without violating First Amendment protections.

They first arrived at the beginning of July: dozens of masked white supremacists, shuffling out of U-Hauls, to march through Nashville carrying upside-down American flags.

A week later, members of a separate neo-Nazi group, waving giant black flags with red swastikas, paraded along the city’s famed strip of honky-tonks and celebrity-owned bars. The neo-Nazis poured into the historic Metro courthouse to disrupt a City Council meeting, harassed descendants of Holocaust survivors and yelled racist slurs at young Black children performing on a downtown street.

The appearance of white nationalists on the streets of a major American city laid bare the growing brazenness of the two groups, the Patriot Front and the Goyim Defense League. Their provocations enraged and alarmed civic leaders and residents in Nashville, causing the city to grapple with how to confront the groups without violating free speech protections.

Non-paywall link

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Left-wing protestors respect the social contract. NAZIs don’t, and therefore do not deserve to be protected by it.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      People don’t deserve equal rights under the law? Are you sure that’s the position you want to take up? Because it sounds like a very Republican position.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Punching NAZIs is always self-defense, even if they haven’t punched you yet. 'Cause they’re going to, 'cause that’s what NAZIs do.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          So you are saying that yes, the law should be applied unequally.

          As I said, Republicans agree with that position. You and they are just at odds with who the same laws should help and who the same laws should oppress.

          Free speech for me and not for thee has been one of their modus operandi for a long time now.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m not arguing with you about this semantic bullshit. To be a NAZI is to declare your intent to commit a crime. NAZIism is a criminal conspiracy.

            There is no “equal protection” issue here, unless you think criminals deserve to be protected.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Please show that your claim has a legal basis in U.S. law.

              Because I can show you the basis for a right to protest. It’s right in the Constitution.

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Did I even once mention US law? Did I say anything about prosecuting the NAZIs? Did I say anything – anything at all – about the government doing anything about them?

                No. I said it is right and good to fuck them up.

                Now quit being a goddamn apologist and deliberately trying to misrepresent my arguments.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Okay, well this is about who has the legal right to protest, so your argument is not relevant to the discussion.