• IronKrill@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      What the parent comment is saying is the implication is that without Elon’s money, he wouldn’t consider EVs. So same meaning.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      No, he said the converse.

      “Opposite” would necessarily suggest a different outcome (i.e. Musk not beholden to Trump).

      (Haven’t had a logic course in literal decades, so maybe someone can correct me if I’m misremembering. I forget how to draw those logic square thingies…)