• Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be better to focus our efforts on getting folks out to vote rather than wishing death upon a man. A strong turnout would be an easy win for Kamala.

        • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Surely you consider yourself to be a better person than Trump, right? So don’t use his shitty behavior to excuse your own.

          • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I want to be a better person than my enemies, but I make an exception for my conduct towards them specifically. Nobody ever won a fight by being nice, and I have no moral qualms about wishing for someone to reap what they so relentlessly sow.

    • Icalasari@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, at this point Trump is his own worst enemy. Better he stay alive than die and become a martyr that the next guy can put words in the mouth of

      • charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The guy says disabled people should die and lately he’s said that if he wins people won’t need to vote in the future. Shoot him in the turkey gobbler

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          …and fascist wanna-be dictator, which is even worse than the rest of it.

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay and? I hate Trump too. Doesn’t mean I’m going to wish death upon him. I want him to face justice for every shitty thing he’s ever done.

          I want Biden and/or Harris to reform the Supreme Court and for Judge Cannon to lose her job based on her inability to be impartial.

          But death? No

          • macniel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            isn’t treason punishable by death? And he being very treasonous, not just by inciting the january riots but also by blatantly undermining the Supreme Court and Democracy as a whole (no longer need to vote).

            But yeah, lets justice, once it has regained its integrity, prevail.

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, because I subscribe to Kantian ethics. You can’t make an ethical rule and add exceptions.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Explain how wishing someone would die is unethical. Do you think the world works on Tinkerbell rules? Putin and Netanyahu are old men. Old men die. I wish they’d go ahead and die already. Where’s the lack of ethics?

            • hddsx@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              There’s a difference between wishing death upon them and death my natural causes.

              Do you think it’s okay to be going around and telling people “I wish you would die”? If it’s not okay for some people it’s not okay for all people per Kant

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                You didn’t say the method of death mattered.

                And no one here is telling Trump, Putin or Netanyahu that they wish they would die because chances are no one here would be able to get close enough to them to do it. And if they did, they’d be the ones who would die.

                So you can keep bringing up Kant, but you’re being both inconsistent and bringing up something irrelevant.

                • barsquid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It is some magical thinking that they want to participate in. Most of us would agree it’s not okay for the government to punish people for no reason. Therefore it is unethical to punish any criminals, per Kant. Lunacy.

                  • hddsx@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That’s not how it works.

                    I like Kant because it provides for this:

                    All humans should have the right to marry who they want to.

                    Because trans and gay people are people, it’s unethical to deny them the right to marry because it would be an exception to the rule.

                    The rule you would advocate for would be:

                    People should not harm others.

                    That rule would mean that harming people is unethical.

              • barsquid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s not okay to tell people who aren’t actively committing atrocities that one wishes they would die. I apply that to all humans equally.

          • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why do you expect others to subscribe to your particular interpretation of one particular philosopher’s ethical framework?