An Olympic athlete has had his finger amputated after he suffered an injury just so he can play in the Paris 2024 Olympic Games.
Just two weeks ago, Matthew Dawson, a 30-year-old hockey player from Australia, suffered a badly broken finger on his right-hand during a team training session in Perth, Australia, and, after consulting with doctors, he found out the injury would take months to recover from and that he would miss out on the opportunity to play in his third Olympic Games.
But instead of opting for a long recovery, Dawson made a decision that would shock his teammates and has already made headlines around the world. He decided to amputate his finger so that he could compete in the 2024 Paris Olympic Games.
Yeah that’s a bad choice. Like real bad.
I’m not sure which finger. But if it was a pinkie, I have to imagine they would more regret missing the Olympics, even if it was the third one.
The pinkie is a terrible one to lose. You don’t realize how important it is until you are missing one. NerdForge had a great video on creating an artificial replacement for her missing pinkie. If I had a choice, the middle finger is a better one to lose and compensate for. Better, as in there isn’t a good one to lose.
You have a third pinky?
Yeah, don’t you? It’s always good to have a jar of spares, just in case you want to go to the Olympics for the third time!
I find it somewhat shocking that the doctors agreed to amputate. You can’t force patients to make good decisions, but amputating a finger because he doesn’t want to wait for it to heal seems to go beyond what’s ethical. If he wasn’t going to be stopped from going regardless I guess you could make an argument it was harm reduction.
Or they might have been worried that he would do it himself if they said no.
That’s what I was thinking… if the doc doesn’t do it then this pounds a bottle of whisky and has his buddies get the hedge trimmers
I would say letting a finger stop you from playing in the Olympics when you’re a hockey player and individual fingers aren’t all that necessary would be the sort of thing that would weigh on someone for years. Leading to clinical depression, in fact. I wouldn’t blame a doctor for doing it. As you said, harm reduction.
That said, this is his third Olympics, so I don’t know if that would be enough in this case.
Its not just that - it’s the state of mind to get to the point of participating at the Olympics. Imagine investing years into something just for some irrelevant random thing to block that.
I don’t really se how an athlete like that missing a finger could ever compare to the decades of regret.
Athletes that have to drop out of events they trained for years can cause them serious psychological damage (with a lot more consequences than a finger ever would). And Olympics are for most athletes once in a lifetime opportunity and goal. Its not a vacation you can just choose.
If the finger can be saved after a couple of months it’s still a bad move since the guy has a good 50 years of his life left.
This was his third Olympics, too.
I’ve learned that it’s only half a finger, so it’s just a nub now. Which I guess is a little better? Still. Bad move, potentially.
Idk, ppl value things differently.
Aside from the FOMO, if he had info from his doctor that the chance of regaining pain free use of the finger after the long recovery was low, then it’s just a personal choice to remove it. We can’t really relate to that.