The Trump campaign on Tuesday filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission arguing money raised for President Joe Biden’s reelection bid cannot be transferred to Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign.

The complaint was filed by the Trump campaign’s general counsel David Warrington and argues transferring the funds would amount to “little more than a thinly veiled $91.5 million excessive contribution from one presidential candidate to another.”

“Kamala Harris is seeking to perpetrate a $91.5 million dollar heist of Joe Biden’s leftover campaign cash — a brazen money grab that would constitute the single largest excessive contribution and biggest violation in the history of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended,” the complaint, a copy of which was obtained by CNN, states.

  • Tire@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Isn’t Trump the one using campaign funds for his personal legal battles?

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh I guarantee they’re going to wrap it in because of they’re successful it gains more power and standing for a bullshit ruling.

        • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Has 0 to do with CU as its not more donations but the transfer of already made donations to the biden campaign to Harris and since Harris was already Biden’s running mate well it’s technically the same campaign so… Trump is just trying the shotgun method, put a lawsuit against anything you don’t like…

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    “If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell”

    • teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts; if you have the law on your side, pound the law; if you have neither the facts nor the law, pound the table.

      That’s the adage as i remember it.

    • aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s no need to force a delay; the FEC moves at a snail’s pace. They’re still working on cases from the 2016 election.

      • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The chairman trump stooge, Sean Cooksey said on Fox yesterday that Harris getting Bidens war chest is “fraudulent.”

        Trump filled the compliment today. He basically signaled to Trump right on Fox, that trump could make the compliment and he will back him

        I guarantee he will drop everything to “rule” on this.

        Ellen Weintraub who is a democratic FEC commissioner said that what Harris is doing isn’t illegal but it doesn’t matter since the chairman who is above her is a fucking toadie to Trump since he gave him the job.

        There are 3 Democrats and 3 Republicans (all nominated by Trump) so it’s likely the vote will be gridlocked and therefore Harris not being able to get the money since the decision will be “on hold.”

        What’s funny is that Cooksey’s term expired in 2021 but he gets to keep serving until a replacement is appointed by the Senate. If MAGA gets the Senate, they will get 2 MAGA replacements for the expired Democrats making any vote 4 -2.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          A gridlocked decision means nothing happens. That’s why nothing happens for all the legitimate stuff before the FEC.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Based on what? The chair isn’t a tiebreaking vote, they don’t just get to make policy choices on an even split. The FEC needs 4 votes to act. There’s no spin involved, if they don’t have 4 votes, they can’t make an action. The chair doesn’t get to define the default result.

              • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Well that is a relief. Although that relies on the chairman not pulling the “bullshit” card for Trump and saying the rules are different for this. MAGA does not respect precedent or the law.

                • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  They just don’t have that power. That’s not what a chairperson is. They can say whatever they want, it doesn’t make it real. You don’t have to rely on Republicans to not spontaneously manifest new authority. They aren’t magic.

        • sawdustprophet@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Trump filled the compliment today

          trump could make the compliment and he will back him

          I’m guessing “compliment” was supposed to be “complaint”?

  • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    What part of the act does it violate exactly?

    Also, hope those lawyers got their money up front (j/k, I don’t care if they get stiffed)

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      IANAL, but I don’t think the PAC can give money to the candidates/campaign. However, they can (independently, and without coordinating) work on the candidates’ behalf.

  • zcd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I heard that he can’t remember that he’s not running against Biden anymore. Many people are saying it

  • Ltcpanic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Proud to be the only one providing actual analysis of legality in these comments so far 🫡

    “I don’t think most campaign finance lawyers believe that this is a best reading of the law,” Rick Hasen, an election law expert at UCLA’s law school, told CNN on Tuesday of the Trump campaign’s argument. But, he added, “that doesn’t mean it can’t get tied up in FEC proceedings for years.”

    Veteran Republican election lawyer Charlie Spies, who briefly served as the RNC’s general counsel earlier this year, argued recently that the Biden-Harris team must be formally nominated by their party before any money could be shifted.

    “If President Biden is committed to passing the torch to his vice president, and wants to be able to seed her campaign with the current Biden for President campaign war chest, he’ll first have to become his party’s legal nominee,” Spies wrote in an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal before Biden’s exit from the race.

    But other campaign finance experts disagree. And Federal Election Commissioner Dara Lindenbaum, a Democrat viewed as a swing vote on the evenly divided commission, has said Harris could access what Biden raised through the campaign committee because it is registered for both the president and vice president.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This was pretty expected and will go nowhere useful for them. They’re literally just wasting time and money. Not only is there not a leg to stand on legally speaking, even if some Trump-sucking judge agreed to this, then the money could just be dumped into a Super PAC, and we all know how good they are at staying “independent.”

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      They’re literally just wasting time and money.

      They’re also muddling the waters.

    • Tire@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You would get a swell of people donating to Harris in protest if the original funds were blocked by a Trump judge.

  • frunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I hope Trump continues wearing that stupid fucking rectangle, it has actually made me laugh out loud on a few occasions… It’s just so absurd! As I’m looking at it, I’m reminded of all of his acolytes wearing them too, that’s usually when i finally crack up. I really would like to try wearing one but i just don’t want to give anyone the wrong idea 👂