A federal judge who is weighing whether to allow the nation’s first execution by nitrogen hypoxia to go forward next month, urged Alabama on Thursday to change procedures so the inmate can pray and say his final words before the gas mask is placed on his face.

U.S. District Judge R. Austin Huffaker made the suggestion in a court order setting a Dec. 29 deadline to submit information before he rules on the inmate’s request to block the execution. The judge made similar comments the day prior at the conclusion of a court hearing.

Alabama is scheduled to execute Kenneth Eugene Smith on Jan. 25 in what would be the nation’s first execution using nitrogen gas. Nitrogen hypoxia is authorized as an execution method in Alabama, Mississippi and Oklahoma but has never been used to put an inmate to death.

The proposed execution method would use a gas mask, placed over Smith’s nose and mouth, to replace breathable air with nitrogen, causing Smith to die from lack of oxygen.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think public executions where the prisoner is tortured to death are more progressive than supposed “humane” methods.

    Not because I like cruelty or think they deserve it, but I want the State to do it’s killing out in the open where citizens are exposed to what’s happening in their name. Hiding the act behind closed doors and beneath a cloak of “humane” methods allows the State to exercise ultimate authority in secret from the people from whom that authority is derived. It’s the State and the supporters of the death penalty that are being spared pain.

    Yes, I got this from Foucault.

    • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You highly overestimate the amount of compassion the average person has. If you torture people to death in public people will sell tickets for the best seats. The Romans built a whole damn arena for this purpose.

      • yesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes! you’re correct. It will be spectacle and celebration. We may revel in our cruelty, but we cannot feign mercy.

        The question of capital punishment comes into focus. I don’t trust in compassion; I’m advocating for honesty.

  • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    So easy to build a sealed room. Why use a mask in the first place? Slowly exchange air for nitrogen and the prisoner dies saying his pointless prayer. Never even knows it happened. No suffering, no nothing. Just lights out. Then re exchange for air so the body can be safely collected. This is not rocket surgery.

  • Occamsrazer@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    The only argument for the death penalty was back before long term prisons were available and someone was too dangerous to be released in society. The death penalty should be obsolete.

  • tygerprints@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    OK. I mean, if that’s what the inmate is requesting, why not allow it. He’s gonna be put to death anyway. Personally I don’t believe his “praying” will be of any use, in this life or the next - if there is one- because I don’t believe in that religious nonsense, or that someone can be “forgiven” for any crime involving murder anyway. But what’s the skin off anybody’s anus if he wants to be executed this way? That should at least be his decision to make.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      But what’s the skin off anybody’s anus if he wants to be executed this way? That should at least be his decision to make.

      The point is cruelty. People are objecting to execution by nitrogen because the prisoner doesn’t suffer enough. That’s the right-wing mentality in a nutshell. They think torturing someone doesn’t make them bad people if that someone “deserves” it.

      • tygerprints@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Good lord. The man probably already lives in a mental hell every single day, what more cruelty does his situation require. Adding more torture to the procedure certainly won’t right any wrongs he may have done, and only unbalances the scales in the direction of bringing more cruelty into the situation than already existed.

      • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Literally what the death penalty is. If what you said was true we would be working on rehabilitation.

        • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          The death penalty is not an ultimate punishment for a crime, in it’s most logical sense. It is based on a conclusion that an individual is ‘beyond saving’, evidenced by the actions they commit. Eliminating them from existence is the only guarantee they never do a similar action in the future.

          There’s plenty of reasons why this reasoning falls apart , though - namely that quite often you can’t be 100% sure you have the actual culprit, or that they are actually ‘beyond saving’.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Should the state have the same low moral bar as criminals? (It’s a rhetorical question that was answered when the state decided to murder someone that’s not a threat anymore in cold blood)

    • OptimusPrimeDownfall@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Probably not. But remember that ~4% of all death row inmates are innocent, so it may be that he didn’t kill anyone.

      Also, shouldn’t the state be better than a murderer? Shouldn’t the mere fact that we believe we, as a society, are civilized mandate allowing a death row inmate respect before they die?

      I’m not religious, so I don’t think praying and final words will do anything. But it won’t harm anyone, and if it makes him more comfortable as he goes out, especially in light of the likelihood he didn’t that to his victim, I’m not against it.