• DarkGamer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Both candidates are experiencing decline, and if Biden were elected and incapable of doing the job it would have resulted in a Harris Presidency anyway. It’s such an odd thing to object over.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Trump will visibly age on stage like Palpatine from the absolute roasting Harris would do to him

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think I remember reading an earlier analysis that says that Trump has no reason to accept debates with any potential new candidate, as it just gives them more visibility.

      • Gerudo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Absolutely. They had no reason to debate Biden again. They sure as shit won’t put him on stage against her, or ANY other candidate.

        • the_frumious_bandersnatch@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          This would be awesome. Give Harris a two hour uninterrupted prime time spot to let the former prosecutor make a case against electing a convicted felon and follow it with 2 hours of the oldest candidate in US history rambling. 😆

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Do you think debates are really going to sway voters at this point? Like the people considering Trump don’t already know what a blowhard he is?