• nicerdicer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think it is important to have cash as a backup.

    A couple of years ago there were some issues with card reading terminals in Germany. Due to a faulty security certificate these card reading terminals were not operational for about a whole month. Many stores were affected, because they almost all use ones from the same manufacturer. The only reason why it wasn’t such a big deal was that people were carrying cash around anyway and were able to switch the method of payment easily. Having cash worked as a backup.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The economy is so fucked i essentially interact with friends and family on a barter system anyway. I bake them cookies and cakes and they let me use their laundry machines.

  • prism@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Agreed. I would love to see a law requiring businesses to accept cash where possible. That sort of law already exists at state and local levels in the US, would like to see it adopted in the UK.

  • shikitohno@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Even cash breaks down pretty quickly in a hypothetical situation where you have something similar occur that lasts for an extended period. When banks’ systems are impacted, how do I get more cash from my account with them when whatever amount I had when the system went down runs out? I haven’t had a physical passbook for an account in a good 20 years.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Campaigners say the chaos caused by the global IT outage last week underlines the risk of moving towards a cashless society.

    Supermarkets, banks, pubs, cafes, train stations and airports were all hit by the failure of Microsoft systems on Friday, leaving many unable to accept electronic payments.

    The Payment Choice Alliance (PCA), which campaigns against the move towards a cashless society, lists 23 firms and groups, at least some of whose outlets take only credit or debit cards.

    Cash payments increased for the first time in a decade last year, according to UK Finance, which represents banks.

    The GMB Union said the outage reinforced what it had been saying for years: that “cash is a vital part of how our communities operate”.

    In March, McDonald’s, Tesco, Sainsbury’s and Gregg’s suffered problems with their payment systems.


    The original article contains 416 words, the summary contains 135 words. Saved 68%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    No, that is not correct. Global outage shows the dangers of centralized systems would be a better headline. Monero Worked all day throughout the entire outage with no problems.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      … And if the systems you actually interact with go down, you can get fucked as well.

      If you want to buy food with Monero and the payment processor for the local shop doesn’t work, even if it’s a local machine sitting in the back office, you still can’t buy anything.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        A local machine sitting in the back office, acting as a payment processor, is much easier to access and fix than the Visa Network.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That is not correct, either. The outage even took out decentralized platforms.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Monero isn’t bad but I don’t think it is great for easily buying things. At the end of the day trying to use two different currencies is hard. Also Monero gets a bad name because it is used primarily for illegal transactions. It is simply two complex and has no accountability

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The fact that it’s used for crime means that it actually does what it’s supposed to do and keeping people private. Shoes are also used by bank robbers and we don’t ban shoes. Monero is a tool the same as a hammer or a shoe or a car or a gun.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Define “worked” in this context. You mean their own infrastructure didn’t crash? You certainly didn’t pop down to the store and buying anything useful with Monero 😂

    • Username@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Even central currencies can work if you can make offline and peer to peer payments.

      Not easy to pull off cryptographically, though.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Socialist scum.

      What are you going to say next, that housing is a human right? That food and water should be free? That the economic surplus should first go to the people in need?

  • Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Would Taler be more resilient than a typical EMV/AmEx card? It’s designed as an online payment system but it’s less centralised, so that could help.

    It’s already an attractive project due to its privacy feature, and due to it being more regulation-friendly that cryptocurrencies. If it’s resilient enough it could act as a digital cash.

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      To me Taler is not a cash alternative, but a card alternative, besides cash. It’s better then cards, probably for everyone involved, but it isn’t better than cash.

  • suction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If you’re against cashless you’re a criminal or a tax evader, which is also criminal.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Like drugs have never been bought on card, and money washed through banks…

      It may be the case that people do not want every single step they take to be monitored as it currently is.

      You might not have a phone or be charged per use of card.

    • frippa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Amazon didnt pay a penny in taxes where i live, theyre giant criminals yet they dont need to use cash to evade taxes.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The ability to pay with cash is great just in case a country’s cashless system(s), especially the one you use the most, goes down for any reason. Gives a backup just in case you need to pay for stuff locally like at a store but your digital money is essentially in limbo until the system(s) is/are fixed.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        How often does that happen though?

        Or… what if the power goes out, you can’t pay with cash or card.

        Honestly if this is the best reason to carry cash then we should be cashless.

        • Enkrod@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Why wouldn’t I be able to pay cash without power? If people did it in BCE, I can certainly do it now.

          • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Because the equipment used to record sales uses electricity.

            Do you really think the 12yo cashier is going to get out a pad and pen and rithmatic your purchase?

            • Enkrod@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              12yo? What’re your child labor laws? Arithmetic? We’re talking simple addition here. I manned a cash register before, it’s doable even without the computer. Just takes a wee bit longer.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Can’t remember which one but credit cards were offline for a time with something and places that still had the carbon paper roller things stashed away took them out and used them. They should keep those things around.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Serious privacy issues around copying cards. That means the store has to retain a physical copy of the full embossed card number.

      There were boxes full of them in the backroom.

        • Truck_kun@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Shop I worked for in 2005… I think … ran cards when the connection was down and took card impressions, and I think the transactions were all auto submitted when the connection came back up.

    • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not sure how much good that’ll be… A lot of banks are giving out cards where the numbers are only printed, I haven’t had one with raised numbers in years.

  • Norgur@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    What good is cash gonna do if the networked cash register doesn’t open anymore?