To be clear, I personally don’t believe that genocidal fascism has to be a non-negotiable bipartisan policy that we just have to accept. I’m just trying to make the point that, if I did accept that premise, then the logical next step would be accelerationism.
To be clear, I personally don’t believe that genocidal fascism has to be a non-negotiable bipartisan policy that we just have to accept. I’m just trying to make the point that, if I did accept that premise, then the logical next step would be accelerationism.
Cool, so you’re just arguing things you don’t believe and only admit to that when you recieve push back.
No, that’s not at all what I said.