Popped over and saw a post saying a user was praising the Uyghur genocide. Read the post and instead it was a guy saying that China was successfully deradicalising terrorists…
So yeah. No ones saying “I love that China is genociding muslims!”
Hey look everyone! It’s a .ml user using a single example to serve as proof that the well-documented dumbassery of .ml is all just made up. Or you know, their MO for all disagreements.
I know your game bud. It’s the same one played by all the kids in .ml, and the same one that MAGA plays.
You tie people up with demands of proof, then you attack the sources or make up bullshit examples of how it’s misunderstood using bad logic or anecdotal rhetoric- or you just whatabout it until people give up- thus prompting you to pat yourself on the back while donning a giant “I win” sign.
I don’t play little edgelord games. You want the proof go find it. It’s plastered everywhere. Now go on and do your little “I won!” dance and say “SEE! Because you won’t prove it it means it’s not true!” and walk away.
Sounds like a convenient excuse to just abandon any standards of evidence whatsoever, as is happening here.
If you can’t provide any evidence whatsoever that a person or group says something, and they reject that characterization of their beliefs, then why should anyone believe a word of what you’re saying?
Oh right, because of the power of tribalism. Gotta agree with all the bullshit or you won’t be accepted into the in-group. Which is the actual “same game MAGA plays.” The anti-intellectualism, tribalism, and lies are right out of their playbook. We can’t really get through your wall of misinformation for the exact same reasons that you can’t get through MAGA’s misinformation, because on a certain level, you don’t even care if the things you’re saying are true or not.
And you free to check the modlogs of .ml for yourself. Go ahead and note all the ambiguous “rule 1” violations, and compare them against the actual rule 1 violates notes.
I’m not doing the work for you. Now go be insufferable somewhere else.
And you free to check the modlogs of .ml for yourself. Go ahead and note all the ambiguous “rule 1” violations, and compare them against the actual rule 1 violates notes.
I’m not doing the work for you. Now go be insufferable somewhere else.
I already checked meanwhileongrad and saw someone lying about a user supporting genocide.
I checked the modlog and saw instances of things on the lines of “oh I knew you guys were just tankies”.
So let’s quit this stupid game.
You show me an example of someone actually advocating for genociding Uyghur muslims or admit you’re just making shit up to justify hating people you disagree with. There’s “entire communities” so you shouldn’t have much trouble.
Popped over and saw a post saying a user was praising the Uyghur genocide. Read the post and instead it was a guy saying that China was successfully deradicalising terrorists…
So yeah. No ones saying “I love that China is genociding muslims!”
Hey look everyone! It’s a .ml user using a single example to serve as proof that the well-documented dumbassery of .ml is all just made up. Or you know, their MO for all disagreements.
That’s one more than you provided
Hey look everyone! It’s multiple users who can’t provide any examples to validate the rumors they’re spreading about people they dislike!
Holy shit is like the projection is directed and purposeful!
I don’t lie and spread rumors like y’all do. When I say something, I have the receipts. No projection here.
I know your game bud. It’s the same one played by all the kids in .ml, and the same one that MAGA plays.
You tie people up with demands of proof, then you attack the sources or make up bullshit examples of how it’s misunderstood using bad logic or anecdotal rhetoric- or you just whatabout it until people give up- thus prompting you to pat yourself on the back while donning a giant “I win” sign.
I don’t play little edgelord games. You want the proof go find it. It’s plastered everywhere. Now go on and do your little “I won!” dance and say “SEE! Because you won’t prove it it means it’s not true!” and walk away.
Or just walk away.
Least deranged anti-communist
Sounds like a convenient excuse to just abandon any standards of evidence whatsoever, as is happening here.
If you can’t provide any evidence whatsoever that a person or group says something, and they reject that characterization of their beliefs, then why should anyone believe a word of what you’re saying?
Oh right, because of the power of tribalism. Gotta agree with all the bullshit or you won’t be accepted into the in-group. Which is the actual “same game MAGA plays.” The anti-intellectualism, tribalism, and lies are right out of their playbook. We can’t really get through your wall of misinformation for the exact same reasons that you can’t get through MAGA’s misinformation, because on a certain level, you don’t even care if the things you’re saying are true or not.
Dude, I know why so many people block you.
Following suit. Hope the choir enjoys your sermon.
Because you had no counter argument
You’ve got nothing and you know it
ROFL. I got nothing? Dude. There’s entire communities dedicated to providing proof. And it’s damn near on a daily basis with you people.
Get a clue.
“There’s entire communities”
Great. It should be really easy to show proof then.
https://sh.itjust.works/c/meanwhileongrad
And you free to check the modlogs of .ml for yourself. Go ahead and note all the ambiguous “rule 1” violations, and compare them against the actual rule 1 violates notes.
I’m not doing the work for you. Now go be insufferable somewhere else.
https://sh.itjust.works/c/meanwhileongrad
And you free to check the modlogs of .ml for yourself. Go ahead and note all the ambiguous “rule 1” violations, and compare them against the actual rule 1 violates notes.
I’m not doing the work for you. Now go be insufferable somewhere else.
I already checked meanwhileongrad and saw someone lying about a user supporting genocide.
I checked the modlog and saw instances of things on the lines of “oh I knew you guys were just tankies”.
So let’s quit this stupid game.
You show me an example of someone actually advocating for genociding Uyghur muslims or admit you’re just making shit up to justify hating people you disagree with. There’s “entire communities” so you shouldn’t have much trouble.
Fucking hilarious.
You really do have nothing